[Gluster-users] Run away memory with gluster mount

Ravishankar N
2018-01-27T04:53:38Z

On 01/27/2018 02:29 AM, Dan Ragle wrote:
>
> On 1/25/2018 8:21 PM, Ravishankar N wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01/25/2018 11:04 PM, Dan Ragle wrote:
>>> *sigh* trying again to correct formatting ... apologize for the
>>> earlier mess.
>>>
>>> Having a memory issue with Gluster 3.12.4 and not sure how to
>>> troubleshoot. I don't *think* this is expected behavior.
>>>
>>> This is on an updated CentOS 7 box. The setup is a simple two node
>>> replicated layout where the two nodes act as both server and
>>> client.
>>>
>>> The volume in question:
>>>
>>> Volume Name: GlusterWWW
>>> Type: Replicate
>>> Volume ID: 8e9b0e79-f309-4d9b-a5bb-45d065faaaa3
>>> Status: Started
>>> Snapshot Count: 0
>>> Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2
>>> Transport-type: tcp
>>> Bricks:
>>> Brick1: vs1dlan.mydomain.com:/glusterfs_bricks/brick1/www
>>> Brick2: vs2dlan.mydomain.com:/glusterfs_bricks/brick1/www
>>> Options Reconfigured:
>>> nfs.disable: on
>>> cluster.favorite-child-policy: mtime
>>> transport.address-family: inet
>>>
>>> I had some other performance options in there, (increased
>>> cache-size, md invalidation, etc) but stripped them out in an
>>> attempt to
>>> isolate the issue. Still got the problem without them.
>>>
>>> The volume currently contains over 1M files.
>>>
>>> When mounting the volume, I get (among other things) a process as
such:
>>>
>>> /usr/sbin/glusterfs --volfile-server=localhost
>>> --volfile-id=/GlusterWWW /var/www
>>>
>>> This process begins with little memory, but then as files are
>>> accessed in the volume the memory increases. I setup a script that
>>> simply reads the files in the volume one at a time (no writes).
It's
>>> been running on and off about 12 hours now and the resident
>>> memory of the above process is already at 7.5G and continues to
grow
>>> slowly. If I stop the test script the memory stops growing,
>>> but does not reduce. Restart the test script and the memory begins
>>> slowly growing again.
>>>
>>> This is obviously a contrived app environment. With my intended
>>> application load it takes about a week or so for the memory to get
>>> high enough to invoke the oom killer.
>>
>> Can you try debugging with the statedump
>>
(https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Troubleshooting/statedump/#read-a-statedump)
>> of
>> the fuse mount process and see what member is leaking? Take the
>> statedumps in succession, maybe once initially during the I/O and
>> once the memory gets high enough to hit the OOM mark.
>> Share the dumps here.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ravi
>
> Thanks for the reply. I noticed yesterday that an update (3.12.5) had
> been posted so I went ahead and updated and repeated the test
> overnight. The memory usage does not appear to be growing as quickly
> as is was with 3.12.4, but does still appear to be growing.
>
> I should also mention that there is another process beyond my test app
> that is reading the files from the volume. Specifically, there is an
> rsync that runs from the second node 2-4 times an hour that reads from
> the GlusterWWW volume mounted on node 1. Since none of the files in
> that mount are changing it doesn't actually rsync anything, but
> nonetheless it is running and reading the files in addition to my test
> script. (It's a part of my intended production setup that I forgot was
> still running.)
>
> The mount process appears to be gaining memory at a rate of about 1GB
> every 4 hours or so. At that rate it'll take several days before it
> runs the box out of memory. But I took your suggestion and made some
> statedumps today anyway, about 2 hours apart, 4 total so far. It looks
> like there may already be some actionable information. These are the
> only registers where the num_allocs have grown with each of the four
> samples:
>
> [mount/fuse.fuse - usage-type gf_fuse_mt_gids_t memusage]
> ?---> num_allocs at Fri Jan 26 08:57:31 2018: 784
> ?---> num_allocs at Fri Jan 26 10:55:50 2018: 831
> ?---> num_allocs at Fri Jan 26 12:55:15 2018: 877
> ?---> num_allocs at Fri Jan 26 14:58:27 2018: 908
>
> [mount/fuse.fuse - usage-type gf_common_mt_fd_lk_ctx_t memusage]
> ?---> num_allocs at Fri Jan 26 08:57:31 2018: 5
> ?---> num_allocs at Fri Jan 26 10:55:50 2018: 10
> ?---> num_allocs at Fri Jan 26 12:55:15 2018: 15
> ?---> num_allocs at Fri Jan 26 14:58:27 2018: 17
>
> [cluster/distribute.GlusterWWW-dht - usage-type gf_dht_mt_dht_layout_t
> memusage]
> ?---> num_allocs at Fri Jan 26 08:57:31 2018: 24243596
> ?---> num_allocs at Fri Jan 26 10:55:50 2018: 27902622
> ?---> num_allocs at Fri Jan 26 12:55:15 2018: 30678066
> ?---> num_allocs at Fri Jan 26 14:58:27 2018: 33801036
>
> Not sure the best way to get you the full dumps. They're pretty big,
> over 1G for all four. Also, I noticed some filepath information in
> there that I'd rather not share. What's the recommended next step?

I've CC'd the fuse/ dht devs to see if these data types have potential
leaks. Could you raise a bug with the volume info and a (dropbox?) link
from which we can download the dumps? You can remove/replace the
filepaths from them.

Regards.
Ravi

>
> Cheers!
>
> Dan
>
>>>
>>> Is there potentially something misconfigured here?
>>>
>>> I did see a reference to a memory leak in another thread in this
>>> list, but that had to do with the setting of quotas, I don't
have
>>> any quotas set on my system.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Dan Ragle
>>> daniel at Biblestuph.com
>>>
>>> On 1/25/2018 11:04 AM, Dan Ragle wrote:
>>>> Having a memory issue with Gluster 3.12.4 and not sure how to
>>>> troubleshoot. I don't *think* this is expected behavior.
This is on an
>>>> updated CentOS 7 box. The setup is a simple two node replicated
layout
>>>> where the two nodes act as both server and client. The volume
in
>>>> question: Volume Name: GlusterWWW Type: Replicate Volume ID:
>>>> 8e9b0e79-f309-4d9b-a5bb-45d065faaaa3 Status: Started Snapshot
Count: 0
>>>> Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1:
>>>> vs1dlan.mydomain.com:/glusterfs_bricks/brick1/www Brick2:
>>>> vs2dlan.mydomain.com:/glusterfs_bricks/brick1/www Options
>>>> Reconfigured:
>>>> nfs.disable: on cluster.favorite-child-policy: mtime
>>>> transport.address-family: inet I had some other performance
options in
>>>> there, (increased cache-size, md invalidation, etc) but
stripped them
>>>> out in an attempt to isolate the issue. Still got the problem
without
>>>> them. The volume currently contains over 1M files. When
mounting the
>>>> volume, I get (among other things) a process as such:
>>>> /usr/sbin/glusterfs --volfile-server=localhost
>>>> --volfile-id=/GlusterWWW
>>>> /var/www This process begins with little memory, but then as
files are
>>>> accessed in the volume the memory increases. I setup a script
that
>>>> simply reads the files in the volume one at a time (no writes).
It's
>>>> been running on and off about 12 hours now and the resident
memory of
>>>> the above process is already at 7.5G and continues to grow
slowly.
>>>> If I
>>>> stop the test script the memory stops growing, but does not
reduce.
>>>> Restart the test script and the memory begins slowly growing
again.
>>>> This
>>>> is obviously a contrived app environment. With my intended
application
>>>> load it takes about a week or so for the memory to get high
enough to
>>>> invoke the oom killer. Is there potentially something
misconfigured
>>>> here? Thanks, Dan Ragle daniel at Biblestuph.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users