[Gluster-users] bitrot log messages

Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 05:23:50 -0000

Hi Jackie,

"gluster vol bitrot <volname> status" should show the corrupted
files gfid.
If you want to get the info from logs, it will be logged as below.

[2016-10-26 05:21:20.767774] A [MSGID: 118023]
[bit-rot-scrub.c:246:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-master-bit-rot-0: CORRUPTION DETECTED:
Object /dir1/file1 {Brick: /bricks/brick1/b10 | GFID:
b912c776-7253-4418-a35f-a37661d673b6}
[2016-10-26 05:21:20.770294] A [MSGID: 118024]
[bit-rot-scrub.c:266:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-master-bit-rot-0: Marking /dir1/file1
[GFID: b912c776-7253-4418-a35f-a37661d673b6 | Brick: /bricks/brick1/b10] as
corrupted..


Thanks and Regards,
Kotresh H R

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jackie Tung" <jackie at drive.ai>
> To: gluster-users at gluster.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 2:14:28 AM
> Subject: [Gluster-users] bitrot log messages
>
> Hi,
>
> Redhat documentation says that things will get logged to bitd.log, and
> scrub.log. These files are pretty big - even when we only take the ? E ?
log
> level lines.
>
>
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Storage/3.1/html/Administration_Guide/chap-Detecting_Data_Corruption.html
>
> Anyone know which particular message patterns we should be actively looking
> for to detect bitrot?
>
> Thanks,
> Jackie
>
>
>
> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
privileged.
> It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone
else
> is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
reliance
> on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users