OpenSSH HPN

Bryan Drewery
2015-11-11T16:53:42Z

On 11/11/2015 8:51 AM, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Bryan Drewery <bdrewery at FreeBSD.org> writes:
>> Another thing that I did with the port was restore the tcpwrapper
>> support that upstream removed. Again, if we decide it is not worth
>> keeping in base I will remove it as default in the port.
>
> I want to keep tcpwrapper support - it is another reason why I still
> haven't upgraded OpenSSH, but to the best of my knowledge, it is far
> less intrusive than HPN.
>

Yes, it's very small.
/usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/files/extra-patch-tcpwrappers


--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/attachments/20151111/cfa2fd3f/attachment.bin>