OpenSSH HPN

Bjoern A. Zeeb
2015-11-11T17:00:00Z

> On 11 Nov 2015, at 16:53 , Bryan Drewery <bdrewery at FreeBSD.org>
wrote:
>
> On 11/11/2015 8:51 AM, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
>> Bryan Drewery <bdrewery at FreeBSD.org> writes:
>>> Another thing that I did with the port was restore the tcpwrapper
>>> support that upstream removed. Again, if we decide it is not worth
>>> keeping in base I will remove it as default in the port.
>>
>> I want to keep tcpwrapper support - it is another reason why I still
>> haven't upgraded OpenSSH, but to the best of my knowledge, it is
far
>> less intrusive than HPN.
>>
>
> Yes, it's very small.
> /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/files/extra-patch-tcpwrappers

And thanks to both of you for keeping it.
It?s often the best you can get if you have machines which run w/o firewalls.

Just wanted to say ?thanks?!

/bz