[Flac-dev] 1.0 candidate checked in

Josh Coalson
Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:45:28 -0000

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 02:42:21PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote:
>
> > --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote:
> > > It does work, but gives a warning:
> > >
> > > *** Warning: Linking the shared library libFLAC.la against the
> *** static
> > > library ia32/libFLAC-asm.a is not portable!
> > >
> > > I think this is just because libtool can't determine whether
the
> objects in
> > > libFLAC-asm.a are PIC or not.  In our case, it shouldn't
matter.
> I'll try
> > > one other approach (getting nasm to act like gas), but for now,
> here is a
> > > patch.
> >
> > Hmm, doesn't work for me (but I'm using libtool-1.3.5).  I
get:
> >
> > libtool: link: cannot build libtool library `libFLAC.la' from
> non-libtool
> > objects: ia32/libFLAC-asm.a
> >
> > Time to get libtool-1.4 I guess... I hope it's not so new that
most
> people
> > don't have it.
>
> automake will include ltmain.sh in the source distribution, so it
> should be
> used even if it isn't installed on the build system.  In fact, it
> seems to
> always use the distributed version, and not the installed one (which
> is
> sometimes annoying).

I don't follow, does that mean someone with libtool-1.4
will have to run automake and send the output to me?

It looks like redhat's latest is 1.3.5 which means I am
now in rpm hell.  Time to get medieval...

Josh


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail