offtopic: rant about thoughtless enabling DMARC checks

Noel Butler
2019-02-10T00:51:44Z

On 10/02/2019 07:38, Ralph Seichter via dovecot wrote:

> * Juri Haberland via dovecot:
>
>> Blindly enabling DMARC checks without thinking about the consequences
>> for themselves should not be the problem of other well behaving
>> participants.
>
> Can you judge if DMARC is enabled "blindly"? No, I thought not.
Also,
> the issue was not on the receiving end, but the reject policy for the
> originating domain.
>
> Personally, I choose to treat "reject" as if it was
"quarantine",
> i.e. affected mail is rerouted to a specific folder.
>
>> And Aki, please go back to "munge only if needed" - munging
all
>> messages leads to a really bad "user experience".
>
> Only speak for yourself please.
>
> -Ralph

+1 (for entire post)

... and surely he does not expect those with a million plus users sit
here and whitelist the million plus mailing lists that exist around the
world, heh, like thats going to happen :)

--
Kind Regards,

Noel Butler

 		This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyright
protected under international law. You may not disseminate, discuss, or
reveal, any part, to anyone, without the authors express written
authority to do so. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
the sender then delete all copies of this message including attachments,
immediately. Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not
waived or lost by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message. Only
PDF [1] and ODF [2] documents accepted, please do not send proprietary
formatted documents



Links:
------
[1] http://www.adobe.com/
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20190210/733d2b8b/attachment.html>