[CentOS] Centso 6.2 bug ?

Alexander Dalloz
2012-01-22T13:12:34Z

Am 22.01.2012 14:08, schrieb Riccardo Veraldi:
> Hello,
> is anyone experiencing this ?
> I have a sympa process (bulk.pl) which triggers this bug:
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:5914 thread_return+0x232/0x79d() (Not tainted)
> Hardware name: X8DTU-LN4+
> Modules linked in: cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf
> ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_state nf_conntrack
> ip6table_filter ip6_tables ipv6 microcode serio_raw i2c_i801 i2c_core
> iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support igb ioatdma dca i7core_edac edac_core sg
> ext4 mbcache jbd2 sr_mod cdrom sd_mod crc_t10dif usb_storage pata_acpi
> ata_generic ata_piix sata_mv dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
> [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
> Pid: 2241, comm: bulk.pl Not tainted 2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64 #1
> Call Trace:
>   [<ffffffff81069997>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x87/0xc0
>   [<ffffffff810699ea>] ? warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
>   [<ffffffff814eccc5>] ? thread_return+0x232/0x79d
>   [<ffffffff810958e3>] ? __hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x1a3/0x460
>   [<ffffffff814ee5db>] ? do_nanosleep+0x8b/0xc0
>   [<ffffffff81095da4>] ? hrtimer_nanosleep+0xc4/0x180
>   [<ffffffff81094b70>] ? hrtimer_wakeup+0x0/0x30
>   [<ffffffff81095bd4>] ? hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x14/0x20
>   [<ffffffff81095ed4>] ? sys_nanosleep+0x74/0x80
>   [<ffffffff8100b0f2>] ? system_call_fastpath+
>
>
> thank you
>
> Rick

http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2012-January/122311.html

Alexander