Hello all, There is kernel-smp-2.6.9-48 from Jason Baron at http://people.redhat.com/~jbaron/rhel4/ Can anyone advice where I can find RPMs of this kernel version for CentOS 4.4 ? Or how it can be created... -- Best regards, Maxim mailto:maxim at osetia.org
Maxim Shpakov wrote:> Hello all, > > There is kernel-smp-2.6.9-48 from Jason Baron at http://people.redhat.com/~jbaron/rhel4/ > Can anyone advice where I can find RPMs of this kernel version for > CentOS 4.4 ? Or how it can be created... > > >and how does that differ from the current kernel-2.6.9-42.0.8.ELsmp ?
Maxim Shpakov wrote:> Hello all, > > There is kernel-smp-2.6.9-48 from Jason Baron at > http://people.redhat.com/~jbaron/rhel4/ Can anyone advice where I can > find RPMs of this kernel version for CentOS 4.4 ? Or how it can be > created...There are some test kernels on <http://dev.centos.org/> - this one is not in there. But you can use the one from your url above on CentOS. Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070219/f2168a8b/attachment.sig>
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 21:36 +0200, Maxim Shpakov wrote:> Hello all, > > There is kernel-smp-2.6.9-48 from Jason Baron at http://people.redhat.com/~jbaron/rhel4/ > Can anyone advice where I can find RPMs of this kernel version for > CentOS 4.4 ? Or how it can be created... >Just for the record ... that link is RHEL testing kernels. Those kernels are not deemed stable or have not passed QA. At random intervals throughout the build cycle, kernels get released there for testing (usually in relation to a bug from the redhat bugzilla). Sometimes we (CentOS) will be a kernel or maybe a couple and put them in our Testing Repo: http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories We do it for the same reason that the upstream guys do, to test fixes to bugs in the CentOS Bug Tracker or because we need a feature in the newer kernel, etc. You can get the RPMS of the RH kernels directly from the above link, and they will work on CentOS. If we have a kernel built that will do what you want in the testing repo, I would use it, as it was complied on CentOS as signed by a CentOS key ... but there is very little that is different and the jbaron kernels should work OK on CentOS. Please do understand the there are possible regressions and possible security updates missing from those kernels, as they are "Testing" and not official "QA'ed" kernels. They may fix a major problem, and you may want to use them ... and by all means, do use them if they make your machine work ... just remember that they need upgraded AS SOON AS POSSIBLE ... for they are _TESTING_ kernels :P Thanks, Johnny Hughes P.S. - Did I mention that those are testing kernels :P -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070219/57ff3757/attachment.sig>
--- Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> wrote:> On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 21:36 +0200, Maxim Shpakov > wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > There is kernel-smp-2.6.9-48 from Jason Baron at > http://people.redhat.com/~jbaron/rhel4/ > > Can anyone advice where I can find RPMs of this > kernel version for > > CentOS 4.4 ? Or how it can be created... > > > > Just for the record ... that link is RHEL testing > kernels. > > Those kernels are not deemed stable or have not > passed QA. > > At random intervals throughout the build cycle, > kernels get released > there for testing (usually in relation to a bug from > the redhat > bugzilla). > > Sometimes we (CentOS) will be a kernel or maybe a > couple and put them in > our Testing Repo: > > http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories > > We do it for the same reason that the upstream guys > do, to test fixes to > bugs in the CentOS Bug Tracker or because we need a > feature in the newer > kernel, etc. > > You can get the RPMS of the RH kernels directly from > the above link, and > they will work on CentOS. If we have a kernel built > that will do what > you want in the testing repo, I would use it, as it > was complied on > CentOS as signed by a CentOS key ... but there is > very little that is > different and the jbaron kernels should work OK on > CentOS. > > Please do understand the there are possible > regressions and possible > security updates missing from those kernels, as they > are "Testing" and > not official "QA'ed" kernels. > > They may fix a major problem, and you may want to > use them ... and by > all means, do use them if they make your machine > work ... just remember > that they need upgraded AS SOON AS POSSIBLE ... for > they are _TESTING_ > kernels :P > > Thanks, > Johnny Hughes > > P.S. - Did I mention that those are testing kernels > :P > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >Johnny, You forgot to mention one thing. That Those Kernels are TESTING KERNELS! ;-P Steven "On the side of the software box, in the 'System Requirements' section, it said 'Requires Windows or better'. So I installed Linux."
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Warning of protential probs with 2.6.9-42.0.3.EL update
- [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] virtio_net: propagate linkspeed/duplex settings from the hypervisor
- [PATCH 2/3] qemu: use 64-bit values for feature flags in virtio-net
- [PATCH v4 0/3] virtio_net: allow hypervisor to indicate linkspeed and duplex setting
- [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] virtio_net: propagate linkspeed/duplex settings from the hypervisor