Jerry Geis
2005-Oct-20 12:53 UTC
[CentOS] 4.2 update removed my zaptel settings from rules.d/50-udev.rules
I have a machine running 4.1 did hte update to 4.2 my zaptel settings (asterisk pbx) seemed to have gotten lost in the update. The file was /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules Jerry
Craig White
2005-Oct-20 13:01 UTC
[CentOS] 4.2 update removed my zaptel settings from rules.d/50-udev.rules
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 07:53 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:> I have a machine running 4.1 did hte update to 4.2 > my zaptel settings (asterisk pbx) seemed to have gotten lost > in the update. The file was /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules >---- that is why you are supposed to not make changes to that file but rather put any changes/new entries in /etc/udev/rules.d/10-udev.rules (or any file that alpha sorts prior to 50-udev.rules Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
2005-Oct-20 13:02 UTC
[CentOS] 4.2 update removed my zaptel settings from rules.d/50-udev.rules
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 07:53 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:> I have a machine running 4.1 did hte update to 4.2 > my zaptel settings (asterisk pbx) seemed to have gotten lost > in the update. The file was /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rulesThis is why you don't modify the stock config files if possible. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net> http://centos.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051020/8b15d503/attachment-0002.sig>