Re: R: Re: Subvolumes and /proc/self/mountinfo

Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-06-21T17:05:51Z

On 06/21/2012 01:46 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2012 schrieb Goffredo Baroncelli:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Now we have the possibility to move the kernel near the
modules, and
>>>> this could lead some interesting possibility: think about
different
>>>> linux installations, with an own kernel version and an own
modules
>>>> version; what are the reasons to put together under /boot
different
>>>> kernel which potential conflicting names ? de facto standard ?
>>>> historical reasons ? Nothing wrong here; but also the idea to
moving
>>>> the kernel under /lib/modules is not so wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No, it is completely, totally and very very seriously wrong.
>>
>> When a bootloader (and the bioses) will be able to address the whole
>> diskS, this will change.. Not now
>
> Why not the other way around? /boot/modules-3.4 or so.
>
> But either way, these are different discussions. H. Peter´s question was,
> if I understood correctly, whether to use subvolid or path?
>

For which ?
If you want to point the bootloader subvolume (where the 2nd stage
relies), I suggest subvolid=. If you need to point to the kernel
(bzImage/initrd) *for my setup* it would be useful to use the path.
Unfortunately these two requirements are in contrast.

> I tend to lean towards subvolid.

>
> Ciao,
Ciao
Goffredo