Re: R: Re: Subvolumes and /proc/self/mountinfo

Martin Steigerwald
2012-06-21T11:46:40Z

Am Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2012 schrieb Goffredo
Baroncelli:
> >
> >
> >> Now we have the possibility to move the kernel near the modules,
and
> >> this could lead some interesting possibility: think about
different
> >> linux installations, with an own kernel version and an own modules
> >> version; what are the reasons to put together under /boot
different
> >> kernel which potential conflicting names ? de facto standard ?
> >> historical reasons ? Nothing wrong here; but also the idea to
moving
> >> the kernel under /lib/modules is not so wrong.
> >
> >
> >
> > No, it is completely, totally and very very seriously wrong.
>
> When a bootloader (and the bioses) will be able to address the whole
> diskS, this will change.. Not now

Why not the other way around? /boot/modules-3.4 or so.

But either way, these are different discussions. H. Peter´s question was,
if I understood correctly, whether to use subvolid or path?

I tend to lean towards subvolid.

Ciao,
--
Martin ''Helios'' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7