Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: simplify iteration codes

sniper
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:20:06 -0000

On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 15:25 +0800, Qinghuang Feng wrote:
>> merge list_for_each and list_entry to list_for_each_entry.
>>
>
> Thanks, I''ve queued this up.
>
Good, but....

Now I have made a new patch for cleanupping all the similar codes in btrfs.
This patch has been tested in VM, it seems ok.

Now should I  rebuild another patch which based the previous patch,
or could you be able to reverse the previous patch then I just post
this new patch including all stuff?

Sorry I am not much familiar with the posting flow, and I am not sure
the meaning of "queued".