Re: Definitive btrfs git tree ?

Chris Samuel
Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:24:54 -0000

On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 8:28:21 am Chris Mason wrote:

> Only mainline is definitive ;)

Oh ha ha! ;-)

> We''ll have a tree with stable fixes that we want Linus to pull,
and
> we''ll have a development tree with unstable experimental stuff
(these
> aren''t yet named).

Ah, so for the moment stick with btrfs-unstable-standalone ?

> For the progs, the btrfs-progs-unstable tree is up to date and safe.
> I''ll make something with a less scary name later this week, and
save the
> unstable tree for development.

Cool, not scary is good (though I''m happy to stay with the scary one).

cheers,
Chris
--
 Chris Samuel  :  http://www.csamuel.org/  :  Melbourne, VIC

This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic.
For more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP