No subject

bogus@does.not.exist.com
Fri, 27 Sep 2013 19:26:02 -0000

The disadvantage (depending on what you're looking at doing) is that they
have to be
in an operating computer

Hmmm ... maybe my wish list for a self-contained FXS should expand to a
self-contained one or two FXS and one FXO with software config and at least two
ethernet ports (like one to internet connection and one to hub/switch for extra
connections).

This would be a nice self-contained branch office VoIP system in a box that
could
interact with an asterisk server for control directions

Maybe such a beast exists.  I don't think I've seen one




Chris Albertson (chrisalbertson90278 at yahoo.com)
wrote*:
>
>
>> There are other products out there though.. Why not use those, or
>> roll
>> your own, if you don't like Cisco's policies?
>
>OK then, simple question:  What is the most cost effective legally
>abtained Ethernet<=>FXS box that will work with Asterisk?
>
>
>====>Chris Albertson
>  Home:   310-376-1029  chrisalbertson90278 at yahoo.com
>  Cell:   310-990-7550
>  Office: 310-336-5189  Christopher.J.Albertson at aero.org
>  KG6OMK
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
>http://taxes.yahoo.com/
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>