asterisk users - May 2009 - From 1.4 to 1.6.0

Hi everyone,

I was just wondering, does anyone managing production asterisk servers 
migrated successfully from 1.4.2X to 1.6.0.X? I would like to see if 
there are some successful cases. Is your 1.6.0.X behaving well, with 
acceptable stability? Please share your experiences.

Thanks,

-- 
Ing. Miguel Molina
Grupo de Tecnolog?a
Millenium Phone Center
PBX: (+57 1)6500800 ext. 1201
Fax: (+57 1)6500816
M?vil: (+57)3138873587

I'd love to see this as well.  After a few days of trying 1.6.1 (from
1.4.21) I dropped back to 1.4.25-rc1 and that is going pretty well.

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Miguel Molina
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:31 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] From 1.4 to 1.6.0

Hi everyone,

I was just wondering, does anyone managing production asterisk servers 
migrated successfully from 1.4.2X to 1.6.0.X? I would like to see if 
there are some successful cases. Is your 1.6.0.X behaving well, with 
acceptable stability? Please share your experiences.

Thanks,

-- 
Ing. Miguel Molina
Grupo de Tecnolog?a
Millenium Phone Center
PBX: (+57 1)6500800 ext. 1201
Fax: (+57 1)6500816
M?vil: (+57)3138873587 


_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Miguel Molina <mmolina at millenium.com.co> writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was just wondering, does anyone managing production asterisk servers 
> migrated successfully from 1.4.2X to 1.6.0.X? I would like to see if 
> there are some successful cases. Is your 1.6.0.X behaving well, with 
> acceptable stability? Please share your experiences.
Asterisk 1.6.0.5 and 1.6.1.0 are performing acceptably here. The new
T.38 features are great, and the BLF/hint changes are nice too.

This bug isn't so nice: https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=13623
We are currently trying the session-timers=refuse workaround.


/Benny