Leif Madsen
2003-Sep-09 09:39 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Has the "allow=all" function changed in sip.conf?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of > Rich Adamson > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:26 PM > To: Asterisk-users-list > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Has the "allow=all" function > changed in sip.conf?> What is the general consciences for the "allow=all" > statement? Should it be used, should it be specific towards > those codecs supported, or removed?And... is this syntax allowed: disallow=all allow=gsm allow=ulaw allow=alaw - -- Leif Madsen - Telecommunications Technology Sheridan College - Trafalgar Campus @: leif.madsen@sheridanc.on.ca ICQ: 3445119 FWD: 18924 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBP14CLOoKt3kNIKTVEQI9nwCeNVRioXqxSxbg2gq4eMNDZ6xmGg0AoO2X KRXfJdJx2YU0FYKFH/kX1teD =SGmT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Ernest W. Lessenger
2003-Sep-09 09:39 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Has the "allow=all" function changed in sip.conf?
At 11:26 AM 9/9/2003 -0600, you wrote:>What is the general consciences for the "allow=all" statement? Should it be >used, should it be specific towards those codecs supported, or removed?My understanding is that you MUST have at least one allow and one deny, or none at all. Just having one or the other causes "problems." --Ernest
Rich Adamson
2003-Sep-09 10:26 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Has the "allow=all" function changed in sip.conf?
I had posted earlier asking about a Snom200 communicating with a C7960 and lots of noise in one direction. Turned out the problem was created by me removing the allow=all statement in sip.conf. Someone had suggested that statement is no longer needed, and using allow=ulaw, etc, had an issue where one or more deny's had to be used as well. By adding allow=ulaw in the sip.conf file, the Snom now correctly interacts with the C7960. Both phones have their defaults set to the same, however the v2.1l Snom code apparently has a problem negotiating that correctly. What is the general consciences for the "allow=all" statement? Should it be used, should it be specific towards those codecs supported, or removed?