Nouveau - Mar 2025 - [PATCH v2] drm/prime: fix drm_prime_gem_destroy comment

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 01:10:58PM +0000, Chris Bainbridge
wrote:
> Edit the comments on correct usage of drm_prime_gem_destroy to note
> that, if using TTM, drm_prime_gem_destroy must be called in the
> ttm_buffer_object.destroy hook, to avoid the dma_buf being freed leaving
> a dangling pointer which will be later dereferenced by
> ttm_bo_delayed_delete.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge at gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com>
Can you please send new version of patches as a new mail thread (not in reply to
previous versions) please?

Otherwise,

	Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr at kernel.org>

@Christian, I assume you will pick this one up?

Am 28.03.25 um 12:01 schrieb Danilo Krummrich:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 01:10:58PM +0000, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
>> Edit the comments on correct usage of drm_prime_gem_destroy to note
>> that, if using TTM, drm_prime_gem_destroy must be called in the
>> ttm_buffer_object.destroy hook, to avoid the dma_buf being freed
leaving
>> a dangling pointer which will be later dereferenced by
>> ttm_bo_delayed_delete.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge at gmail.com>
>> Suggested-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> Can you please send new version of patches as a new mail thread (not in
reply to
> previous versions) please?
>
> Otherwise,
>
> 	Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr at kernel.org>
>
> @Christian, I assume you will pick this one up?
Sure, I can take care of that.

Regards,
Christian.