On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 20:43:36 -0600 Mike Brown via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 11:26:38AM +0000, Rowland Penny via samba > wrote: > > On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 03:29:17 -0600 > > Mike Brown via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > What is strange is that it is working fine with V3(?) under > > > Fedora 27. The only difference, that I know of, is V4 under F41. > > > > It isn't strange, it is to be expected. > > If I remember correctly, fedora 27 came with Samba 4.7.9 and the > > default for 'server min protocol' was 'LANMAN1' > > This was changed at Samba 4.11.0 to default to 'SMB2_02' > > Thanks for the info. > > > This means that if your Win7 machine is only using SMBv1, then it > > could connect to the fedora 27 machine, but it would not be able to > > connect to fedora 41, where SMBv1 is turned off by default. > > I need to find out what it is. >I installed win7 in a VM over the weekend, I just created a local Windows user and did not join it to the domain. I then created a share on a Unix domain member, which was running Samba 4.21.3 and with 'disable netbios = yes' set (so definitely no NetBIOS): [testshare] path = /srv/test read only = no I set the permissions, as a test, to '0777': ls -lad /srv/test drwxrwxrwx 3 root root 4096 Mar 2 13:23 /srv/test Connected (in Network) from the win7 machine: \\192.168.1.114\testshare Entered my domain username & password when prompted, I was logged in and was allowed to create a directory, checking on the Unix domain member gave this: ls -la /srv/test total 16 drwxrwxrwx 3 root root 4096 Mar 2 13:23 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Mar 2 13:17 .. drwxrwxr-x+ 2 rowland domain users 4096 Mar 2 13:22 testfolder So I created another share, set 'map to guest = bad user' in 'global' on the server and connected to the share as an unknown user and that worked. So it is possible, it looks like something on the OPs win7 isn't set up correctly. Rowland
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:57:42AM +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:> On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 20:43:36 -0600 > Mike Brown via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 11:26:38AM +0000, Rowland Penny via samba > > wrote: > > > On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 03:29:17 -0600 > > > Mike Brown via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > What is strange is that it is working fine with V3(?) under > > > > Fedora 27. The only difference, that I know of, is V4 under F41. > > > > > > It isn't strange, it is to be expected. > > > If I remember correctly, fedora 27 came with Samba 4.7.9 and the > > > default for 'server min protocol' was 'LANMAN1' > > > This was changed at Samba 4.11.0 to default to 'SMB2_02' > > > > Thanks for the info. > > > > > This means that if your Win7 machine is only using SMBv1, then it > > > could connect to the fedora 27 machine, but it would not be able to > > > connect to fedora 41, where SMBv1 is turned off by default. > > > > I need to find out what it is. > > > > I installed win7 in a VM over the weekend, I just created a local > Windows user and did not join it to the domain. > > I then created a share on a Unix domain member, which was running Samba > 4.21.3 and with 'disable netbios = yes' set (so definitely no NetBIOS): > > [testshare] > path = /srv/test > read only = no > > I set the permissions, as a test, to '0777': > > ls -lad /srv/test > drwxrwxrwx 3 root root 4096 Mar 2 13:23 /srv/test > > Connected (in Network) from the win7 machine: > > \\192.168.1.114\testshare > > Entered my domain username & password when prompted, I was logged in > and was allowed to create a directory, checking on the Unix domain > member gave this: > > ls -la /srv/test > total 16 > drwxrwxrwx 3 root root 4096 Mar 2 13:23 . > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Mar 2 13:17 .. > drwxrwxr-x+ 2 rowland domain users 4096 Mar 2 13:22 testfolder > > So I created another share, set 'map to guest = bad user' in 'global' > on the server and connected to the share as an unknown user and that > worked. > > So it is possible, it looks like something on the OPs win7 isn't set up > correctly.Thanks for the update. More digging. MB -- e-mail: vidiot at vidiot.com | vidiot at vidiot.net /~\ The ASCII 6082066843 at email.uscc.net (140 char limit) \ / Ribbon Campaign Visit - URL: http://vidiot.com/ X Against http://vidiot.net/ / \ HTML Email GEORDI: "Data, could you try being a little more positive..." DATA: "I hope we die quickly!" (Star Trek: Picard - 4/13/23)
As an experiment, I thought I would try mounting from the new linux to the old
linux. I was able to mount from the old to the new while working on fixing
a bad hdd in the old linux. That mount worked great.
But, when I tried to go from new to old, it failed:
mount -t cifs -o username=brown //192.168.1.1/usenet-new /mnt/usenet-new
resulted in:
Unable to find suitable address.
It asked for the password, but then gave the above error message.
Another clue?
MB
--
e-mail: vidiot at vidiot.com | vidiot at vidiot.net /~\ The ASCII
6082066843 at email.uscc.net (140 char limit) \ / Ribbon
Campaign
Visit - URL: http://vidiot.com/ X Against
http://vidiot.net/ / \ HTML Email
GEORDI: "Data, could you try being a little more positive..."
DATA: "I hope we die quickly!" (Star Trek: Picard - 4/13/23)