Dear Rowland,
Thank you for your answer. We hoped that 4.18.10 that was recently
released would include some change on this regard, but unfortunately not.
We are in a quite difficult position to explain this to users and asking
to whom creates a folder structure for first to create a text file with
the names of the folders for the colleagues to see, it is really quite a
workaround we would like to avoid as it adds useless overhead to the
process of applying for rights to a folder.
Is there any idea about something we can tweak in ACLs or in the samba
conf that could bring back the original behaviour of listing for users
that don?t have access?? I.e. list the folder and just produce the
"access denied" message?
(as mentioned in the initial message access based share enum = no, hide
unreadable = no are set but did not apply. Do we miss something there or
are those deprecated anyway?)
Best
Ilias
Am 23.01.24 um 18:21 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:> On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:20:22 +0100
> Ilias Chasapakis forumZFD via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Passing from samba 4.17 to 4.18 we noticed a change in behaviour in
>> folder/files listing.
>>
>> In 4.17 when someone had read and open rights for a folder but no
>> write/modify access then the folder would be visible but clicking on
>> any "non-accessible" resource resulted in a message notifying
that no
>> access was granted.
>>
>> Since 4.18 the folder is simply completely invisible. I don? t argue
>> about this being "correct" behaviour or not. It is just that
our
>> users where just used to having the whole list and knowing what is in
>> there (and eventually ask access to it to us or the relevant
>> department that then forwards to us).
>>
>> Is there a way to have that "old behaviour" back while still
using
>> samba 4.18? We tried the options suggested in some forums (access
>> based share enum = no, hide unreadable = no) for the samba
>> configuration to no avail. Is there actually some option or any other
>> ACL setting technique that can bring back that behaviour?
>>
> I wonder if you have run into the fall out from fixing bug 15093 ?
>
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15093
>
> I know that you haven't mentioned NFS, but it is the only thing that I
> can think of that seems to have relevance.
>
> Rowland
>
>
--
?forumZFD
Entschieden f?r Frieden | Committed to Peace
Ilias Chasapakis
Referent IT | IT Consultant
Forum Ziviler Friedensdienst e.V. | Forum Civil Peace Service
Am K?lner Brett 8 | 50825 K?ln | Germany
Tel 0221 91273243 | Fax 0221 91273299 | http://www.forumZFD.de
Vorstand nach ? 26 BGB, einzelvertretungsberechtigt|Executive Board:
Alexander Mauz, Sonja Wiekenberg-Mlalandle, Jens von Bargen
VR 17651 Amtsgericht K?ln
Spenden|Donations: IBAN DE90 4306 0967 4103 7264 00 BIC GENODEM1GLS
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 665 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20240206/e6be7027/OpenPGP_signature.sig>