Linux Ethernet Bridging - Mar 2023 - [Bridge] [PATCH v2 net-next 2/6] net: dsa: propagate flags down towards drivers

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 15:43, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:45:26PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
>> So the solution would be to not let the DSA layer send the
>> SWITCHDEV_FDB_OFFLOADED event in the case when the new dynamic flag is
>> set?
>
> I have never said that.
No, I was just thinking of a solution based on your previous comment
that dynamic fdb entries with the offloaded flag set should not be aged
out by the bridge as they are now.

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 02:59:04PM +0200, Hans Schultz
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 15:43, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv at gmail.com>
wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:45:26PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
> >> So the solution would be to not let the DSA layer send the
> >> SWITCHDEV_FDB_OFFLOADED event in the case when the new dynamic
flag is
> >> set?
> >
> > I have never said that.
> 
> No, I was just thinking of a solution based on your previous comment
> that dynamic fdb entries with the offloaded flag set should not be aged
> out by the bridge as they are now.
If you were a user of those other drivers, and you ran the command:
"bridge fdb add ... master dynamic"
would you be ok with the behavior: "I don't have dynamic FDB entries,
but here's a static one for you"?