Nut upsuser - Jul 2021 - [EXTERNAL] Proposed RFC - independent reviewers wanted

> Is anyone on this list interested in volunteering?
Generally interested. Can I get the elevator pitch on what being an
"Independent Reviewer" entails?
Would like to understand if I'm qualified and available enough to do it in a
reasonable amount of time.


Thank you,
David Zomaya
Tripp Lite
________________________________
 This message is for the addressee's use only. It may contain confidential
information. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and notify
the sender. Tripp Lite disclaims all warranties and liabilities, and assumes no
responsibility for viruses which may infect an email sent to you from Tripp Lite
and which damage your electronic systems or information. It is your
responsibility to maintain virus detection systems to prevent damage to your
electronic systems and information.

On Tue, 27 Jul 2021, David Zomaya wrote:
>> Is anyone on this list interested in volunteering?
>
> Generally interested. Can I get the elevator pitch on what being an 
> "Independent Reviewer" entails? Would like to understand if
I'm qualified and
> available enough to do it in a reasonable amount of time.
The reviewer is someone with a general understanding of computer systems and 
maybe of power supplies as well, who asks:

  1) Does this text introduce and explain the subject in a way which is 
understandable to someone who is not a NUT expert?

  2) Is the technical writing of an acceptable standard?  For example, are 
technical terms and acronyms explained?

  3) For someone who already knows NUT, is the description of the NUT
command/response protocol correct?

Roger

Current draft:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-rprice-ups-management-protocol-04.html