Gluster users - Jul 2022 - Right way to use community Gluster on genuine RHEL?

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 6:34 PM Thomas Cameron <
thomas.cameron at camerontech.com> wrote:
> On 7/18/22 09:18, P?ter K?roly JUH?SZ wrote:
> > The best would be officially pre built rpms for RHEL.
>
> Where are there official Red Hat Gluster 10 RPMs for RHEL?
>
There's no such thing. Let's not confuse the upstream Gluster project
and
Red Hat product - RHGS (Red Hat Gluster Storage), which has a different
version[1] and lifecycle[2] than the project.
Red Hat does not build upstream project official RPMs for RHEL.

That being said, I'm somewhat surprised the CentOS RPMs don't work on
RHEL
- is that indeed the case?
Y.

[1] https://access.redhat.com/solutions/543123
[2] https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhs
>
> Thomas
>
> ________
>
>
>
> Community Meeting Calendar:
>
> Schedule -
> Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
> Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20220718/23782c43/attachment.html>

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 11:46 AM Yaniv Kaul <ykaul at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 6:34 PM Thomas Cameron <
> thomas.cameron at camerontech.com> wrote:
>
>> On 7/18/22 09:18, P?ter K?roly JUH?SZ wrote:
>> > The best would be officially pre built rpms for RHEL.
>>
>> Where are there official Red Hat Gluster 10 RPMs for RHEL?
>>
>
> There's no such thing. Let's not confuse the upstream Gluster
project and
> Red Hat product - RHGS (Red Hat Gluster Storage), which has a different
> version[1] and lifecycle[2] than the project.
> Red Hat does not build upstream project official RPMs for RHEL.
>
> That being said, I'm somewhat surprised the CentOS RPMs don't work
on RHEL
> - is that indeed the case?
> Y.
>
>
 No.  The CentOS packages work fine on RHEL.

-- 

Kaleb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20220718/ce37a935/attachment.html>

On 7/18/22 10:45, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 6:34 PM Thomas Cameron 
> <thomas.cameron at camerontech.com> wrote:
>
>     On 7/18/22 09:18, P?ter K?roly JUH?SZ wrote:
>     > The best would be officially pre built rpms for RHEL.
>
>     Where are there official Red Hat Gluster 10 RPMs for RHEL?
>
>
> There's no such thing. Let's not confuse the upstream Gluster
project
> and Red Hat product - RHGS (Red Hat Gluster Storage), which has a 
> different version[1] and lifecycle[2] than the project.
> Red Hat does not build upstream project official RPMs for RHEL.
>
> That being said, I'm somewhat surprised the?CentOS RPMs don't work
on
> RHEL - is that indeed the case?
> Y.
>
> [1] https://access.redhat.com/solutions/543123
> [2] https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhs

I know, I was being something of a smartass. Sorry if that was not clear.

I am interested in trying the latest, community versions of Samba-416 
and Gluster-10 on RHEL. That was why I was asking the question. Sure, I 
can absolutely use the Red Hat Gluster Storage software from the 
official repos, but I am interested in playing with the latest and 
greatest community bits... but on RHEL. I *can* use CentOS, but I prefer 
to use genuine RHEL. I was wondering if there was a "right" way of
doing
so. I am playing with the CentOS Gluster-10 and Samba-416 repos just to 
learn. It looks like they work just fine once I enabled EPEL and those 
CentOS repos.

I was more checking to see if there were any problems just enabling the 
CentOS Storage SIG repos on RHEL. So far, it does not appear that there 
are problems. So far, it seems to be working.

Thanks for all the responses. I appreciate them.

Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20220718/73e4b70c/attachment.html>