On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:00:08 -0500 Paul Bernal <paulbernal07 at gmail.com> wrote:> Each pixel column in the training set has a name like pixel x, where > x is an integer between 0 and 783, inclusive. To locate this pixel on > the image, suppose that we have decomposed x as x = i ? 28 + j, where > i and j are integers between 0 and 27, inclusive.> I have been looking for information about how to process this with R, > but have not found anything yet.Given a 784-element vector x, you can reshape it into a 28 by 28 matrix: dim(x) <- c(28, 28) Or create a new matrix: matrix(x, 28, 28) Working with more dimensions is also possible. A matrix X with dim(X) == c(n, 784) can be transformed into a three-way array in place or copied into one: dim(X) <- c(dim(X)[1], 28, 28) array(X, c(dim(X)[1], 28, 28)) (Replace 28,28 with 784 for an inverse transformation. In modern versions of R, two-way arrays are more or less the same as matrices, but old versions may disagree with that in some corner cases.) For more information, see ?dim, ?matrix, ?array. -- Best regards, Ivan
Thank you very much Ivan! El El jue, 24 de feb. de 2022 a la(s) 12:00 p. m., Ivan Krylov < krylov.r00t at gmail.com> escribi?:> On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:00:08 -0500 > Paul Bernal <paulbernal07 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Each pixel column in the training set has a name like pixel x, where > > x is an integer between 0 and 783, inclusive. To locate this pixel on > > the image, suppose that we have decomposed x as x = i ? 28 + j, where > > i and j are integers between 0 and 27, inclusive. > > > I have been looking for information about how to process this with R, > > but have not found anything yet. > > Given a 784-element vector x, you can reshape it into a 28 by 28 matrix: > > dim(x) <- c(28, 28) > > Or create a new matrix: matrix(x, 28, 28) > > Working with more dimensions is also possible. A matrix X with dim(X) > == c(n, 784) can be transformed into a three-way array in place or > copied into one: > > dim(X) <- c(dim(X)[1], 28, 28) > array(X, c(dim(X)[1], 28, 28)) > > (Replace 28,28 with 784 for an inverse transformation. In modern > versions of R, two-way arrays are more or less the same as matrices, > but old versions may disagree with that in some corner cases.) > > For more information, see ?dim, ?matrix, ?array. > > -- > Best regards, > Ivan >[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Dear Ivan, this is what I did:
dataframe_train <- as.matrix((read.csv(file_path_2, header=TRUE,
stringsAsFactors = FALSE)))
dim(dataframe_train) <- c(28,28)
The file I read was the one I attached in the first email. Would this do
the work to reshape original dataset into a 28 x 28 matrix? When I print
the original dataframe I get the message: [ reached
getOption("max.print")
-- omitted 41999 rows ] this only means that R will not pront the whole
data, but is not trimming anything right?
Best regards,
Paul
El jue, 24 feb 2022 a las 12:00, Ivan Krylov (<krylov.r00t at gmail.com>)
escribi?:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:00:08 -0500
> Paul Bernal <paulbernal07 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Each pixel column in the training set has a name like pixel x, where
> > x is an integer between 0 and 783, inclusive. To locate this pixel on
> > the image, suppose that we have decomposed x as x = i ? 28 + j, where
> > i and j are integers between 0 and 27, inclusive.
>
> > I have been looking for information about how to process this with R,
> > but have not found anything yet.
>
> Given a 784-element vector x, you can reshape it into a 28 by 28 matrix:
>
> dim(x) <- c(28, 28)
>
> Or create a new matrix: matrix(x, 28, 28)
>
> Working with more dimensions is also possible. A matrix X with dim(X)
> == c(n, 784) can be transformed into a three-way array in place or
> copied into one:
>
> dim(X) <- c(dim(X)[1], 28, 28)
> array(X, c(dim(X)[1], 28, 28))
>
> (Replace 28,28 with 784 for an inverse transformation. In modern
> versions of R, two-way arrays are more or less the same as matrices,
> but old versions may disagree with that in some corner cases.)
>
> For more information, see ?dim, ?matrix, ?array.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Ivan
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]