Rasmus Villemoes
2021-Feb-02 07:40 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] bridge: mrp: Extend br_mrp_switchdev_*
On 30/01/2021 04.01, Jakub Kicinski wrote:> On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:52:37 +0100 Horatiu Vultur wrote: >> This patch series extends MRP switchdev to allow the SW to have a better >> understanding if the HW can implement the MRP functionality or it needs >> to help the HW to run it. There are 3 cases:>> v2: >> - fix typos in comments and in commit messages >> - remove some of the comments >> - move repeated code in helper function >> - fix issue when deleting a node when sw_backup was true > > Folks who were involved in previous MRP conversations - does this look > good to you? Anyone planning to test? >I am planning to test these, but it's unlikely I'll get around to it this week unfortunately. Rasmus
Jakub Kicinski
2021-Feb-02 19:50 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] bridge: mrp: Extend br_mrp_switchdev_*
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 08:40:02 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes wrote:> On 30/01/2021 04.01, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:52:37 +0100 Horatiu Vultur wrote: > >> This patch series extends MRP switchdev to allow the SW to have a better > >> understanding if the HW can implement the MRP functionality or it needs > >> to help the HW to run it. There are 3 cases: > > >> v2: > >> - fix typos in comments and in commit messages > >> - remove some of the comments > >> - move repeated code in helper function > >> - fix issue when deleting a node when sw_backup was true > > > > Folks who were involved in previous MRP conversations - does this look > > good to you? Anyone planning to test? > > I am planning to test these, but it's unlikely I'll get around to it > this week unfortunately.Horatiu are you okay with deferring the series until Rasmus validates? Given none of this HW is upstream now (AFAIU) this is an awkward set to handle. Having a confirmation from Rasmus would make us a little bit more comfortable.