Marc
2022-Oct-01 11:52 UTC
Pigeonhole redirect is adding a message-id header when it already exists
> >Oct 1 13:31:46 xxxx sendmail[30321]: 291BVjjx030318: > to=<xxxx at gmail.com>, delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, > pri=122536, relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com. [142.250.102.27], > dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (OK 1664623906 gs19- > 20020a1709072d1300b00777a40d515dsi4096082ejc.456 - gsmtp) > > > >I just tested for you, enabled the sieve forward, send test mail and > the forward is being accepted by google. > > > > > > Thanks for the test. However, does your test mail had a "bogus" > Message-ID header in it like I tried to explain ? >You wrote in the original email the message was rejected. Sorry I don't have login access to my gmail test account anymore since the google @#$%@#$% wanted to have me add a phone number.
Sébastien Riccio
2022-Oct-01 12:00 UTC
Pigeonhole redirect is adding a message-id header when it already exists
>You wrote in the original email the message was rejected. Sorry I don't have login access to my gmail test account anymore since the google @#$%@#$% wanted to have me add a phone number.In my original post I said that gmail was rejecting the forwards because of duplicate headers, and that the duplicate header seems to be a Message-ID added by pigeonhole when it's "not happy" with the original mail Message-ID. I probably failed to explain the issue clearly and sorry for that. Thank you anyway for trying to help :)
justina colmena ~biz
2022-Oct-01 14:35 UTC
RE: Re[4]: Pigeonhole redirect is adding a message-id header when it already exists
These are real people with bank accounts? Get paid? Have money for breakfast lunch dinner and a roof over their heads? Just asking because my own bank account stupidly enough requires a phone number to log in online whether or not I even have an email address. And the POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service) system, including cell phone service, unlike the internet at large which is based on open standards, is a highly proprietary closed-source-only multinational corporate fee-for-service system based on billing and debt collections for long distance calls, mostly owned by fraudsters, blackmailers, thieves, extortioners and hackers, and subject to strict intellectual property restrictions and intelligence surveillance by various governments and nation-states as well as court orders relating to domestic violence restraining orders, no-contact orders and various other "established" service of process in local small town court systems to obstruct or deny access. AT&T and friends have been around since the early railroad days, and there are people who need to be SERVED here like no one has ever been served in over 150 years in the United States. On October 1, 2022 3:52:43 AM AKDT, Marc <Marc at f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote:>> >Oct 1 13:31:46 xxxx sendmail[30321]: 291BVjjx030318: >> to=<xxxx at gmail.com>, delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, >> pri=122536, relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com. [142.250.102.27], >> dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (OK 1664623906 gs19- >> 20020a1709072d1300b00777a40d515dsi4096082ejc.456 - gsmtp) >> > >> >I just tested for you, enabled the sieve forward, send test mail and >> the forward is being accepted by google. >> > >> > >> >> Thanks for the test. However, does your test mail had a "bogus" >> Message-ID header in it like I tried to explain ? >> > >You wrote in the original email the message was rejected. Sorry I don't have login access to my gmail test account anymore since the google @#$%@#$% wanted to have me add a phone number.-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20221001/cbe6578d/attachment.htm>