samba - Nov 2022 - Unable to access shares after upgrade to version 4.17.3

On 21/11/2022 14:31, Ingo Asche via samba wrote:
> Hi Rowland,
> 
> this may be a dumb question, but will this regression fixed in both 
> systems? 32bit and 64bit?
> 
> I'm asking because I have a complete 64bit system. The problem is only 
> showing (at the moment) on shares of my Synology NAS. This device is 
> also a 64bit, but - as you may know - Synology uses a Samba of its own, 
> based on version 4.10. At least their package shows this version.
> 
I know little about the synology version of Samba, what I do know is 
that they take the standard version of Samba and add to and change it. 
This is obvious from the smb.conf files from their products that have 
been posted to this list, they contain parameters that do not exist in 
standard Samba.

As to whether any Samba changes make it into the synology samba, well 
your guess is as good as mine, last time I heard the synology samba 
version was well behind the official Samba version.

Rowland

Hi all

First thank you for such an amazing product!

I have about 20 synologys deployed and I saw the exact same issue when we
did an initial rollout of 4.17.2
We did not move any clients with synologys to 4.17.1
I did not see the issue in our lab as we have a truenas and windows file
server there.
We did halt all roll outs of 4.17.x until a fix is discovered on the samba
or the synology side.
I will be testing 4,17.4 when it is released to see if the issue is
resolved.

I can pull packet captures etc if any of that is helpful.

Travis Wenks
Rose City Solutions
travis at rosecitysolutions.com
503-821-7000


On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 9:18 AM Rowland Penny via samba <
samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 21/11/2022 14:31, Ingo Asche via samba wrote:
> > Hi Rowland,
> >
> > this may be a dumb question, but will this regression fixed in both
> > systems? 32bit and 64bit?
> >
> > I'm asking because I have a complete 64bit system. The problem is
only
> > showing (at the moment) on shares of my Synology NAS. This device is
> > also a 64bit, but - as you may know - Synology uses a Samba of its
own,
> > based on version 4.10. At least their package shows this version.
> >
>
> I know little about the synology version of Samba, what I do know is
> that they take the standard version of Samba and add to and change it.
> This is obvious from the smb.conf files from their products that have
> been posted to this list, they contain parameters that do not exist in
> standard Samba.
>
> As to whether any Samba changes make it into the synology samba, well
> your guess is as good as mine, last time I heard the synology samba
> version was well behind the official Samba version.
>
> Rowland
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>

Hi Rowland,

that wasn't my question. I asked about the regression fix in 4.17.4. 
Will that be done in both versions? 32bit and 64bit or only in the 32bit 
environment?

Regards
Ingo
https://github.com/WAdama

Rowland Penny via samba schrieb am 21.11.2022 um 18:17:
>
>
> On 21/11/2022 14:31, Ingo Asche via samba wrote:
>> Hi Rowland,
>>
>> this may be a dumb question, but will this regression fixed in both 
>> systems? 32bit and 64bit?
>>
>> I'm asking because I have a complete 64bit system. The problem is 
>> only showing (at the moment) on shares of my Synology NAS. This 
>> device is also a 64bit, but - as you may know - Synology uses a Samba 
>> of its own, based on version 4.10. At least their package shows this 
>> version.
>>
>
> I know little about the synology version of Samba, what I do know is 
> that they take the standard version of Samba and add to and change it. 
> This is obvious from the smb.conf files from their products that have 
> been posted to this list, they contain parameters that do not exist in 
> standard Samba.
>
> As to whether any Samba changes make it into the synology samba, well 
> your guess is as good as mine, last time I heard the synology samba 
> version was well behind the official Samba version.
>
> Rowland
>
>