On Sun, 2021-11-28 at 13:34 +0100, Daniel Berteaud via samba
wrote:> ----- Le 26 Nov 21, ? 19:58, Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org a
> ?crit :
> > Sounds like a bug. The emission of audit logs is not tested (was
> > too
> > hard), only the code right up to where they are printed, so a
> > regression certainly is possible.
> >
> > Do you have the time to try a 'git bisect' to find out where
this
> > went
> > wrong?
> >
> > Do the bisect between the tags samba-4.14.0rc1 and samba-4.15.2
>
> My git-foo is probably too limited for that ;-)
I'm still going to need you to give it a try. Our resources are
limited and by doing that you give the best chance that the issue can
be investigated.
Follow this thread for instructions:
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2021-October/237653.html
> > And yes, please file a bug, I've sent you an invite to our
> > bugzilla.
>
> Bug opened : https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14920
>
> I can provide more info if needed.
A full (redacted) smb.conf plus examples of the different logs.
Also showing what happens with just plan logging (not systemd) and
without directing the logs to different files.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett (he/him) https://samba.org/~abartlet/
Samba Team Member (since 2001) https://samba.org
Samba Team Lead, Catalyst IT https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
Samba Development and Support, Catalyst IT - Expert Open Source
Solutions