samba - Jun 2022 - Broken Dependencies?

01.06.2022 08:56, Dirk Laurenz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> if i understand this right, you will provide new packages?
Yes and no.

The "no" is about your issue. What you face is a stack corruption,
where sack backtrace fails. Samba as shipped on Debian does have
a proper stack backtrace support, but in your case it fails because
stack is corrupt, not because there's no support.

The "yes" part is that sure I will provide new backports, for later
samba releases. Including the fix for the problem you have, once we
know the fix.

I think I'll try to reproduce the prob on a local qemu-emulated arm
machine, as time permits (recently it was a scarce resource).

Thanks,

/mjt

HI,

thanks for the input. Does this problem also happen on amd64? Or are the
backports working there?
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Juni 2022 10:28
> An: Dirk Laurenz <samba at laurenz.ws>; 'Andrew Bartlett'
> <abartlet at samba.org>; 'sambalist' <samba at
lists.samba.org>
> Betreff: Re: AW: [Samba] Broken Dependencies?
> 
> 01.06.2022 08:56, Dirk Laurenz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > if i understand this right, you will provide new packages?
> 
> Yes and no.
> 
> The "no" is about your issue. What you face is a stack
corruption, where sack
> backtrace fails. Samba as shipped on Debian does have a proper stack
> backtrace support, but in your case it fails because stack is corrupt, not
> because there's no support.
> 
> The "yes" part is that sure I will provide new backports, for
later samba
> releases. Including the fix for the problem you have, once we know the fix.
> 
> I think I'll try to reproduce the prob on a local qemu-emulated arm
machine, as
> time permits (recently it was a scarce resource).
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> /mjt