samba - Feb 2021 - Centos Dead.. beware guys.

Am 17.02.21 um 11:11 schrieb Dmitry Melekhov:
> 17.02.2021 14:03, Reindl Harald ?????:
>>
>>
>> Am 17.02.21 um 10:57 schrieb Dmitry Melekhov:
>>> 17.02.2021 13:50, Reindl Harald ?????:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 17.02.21 um 05:15 schrieb Dmitry Melekhov via samba:
>>>>> 16.02.2021 18:46, S?rgio Basto via samba ?????:
>>>>>> On Tue, 2021-02-16 at 09:21 +0100, L.P.H. van Belle via
samba wrote:
>>>>>>> Bye bye Centos..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/01/centos-is-gone-but-rhel-is-now-free-for-up-to-16-production-servers/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Welkom CloudLinux
>>>>>>>
https://blog.cloudlinux.com/announcing-open-sourced-community-driven-rhel-fork-by-cloudlinux
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you guys know.
>>>>>> I point of view, Centos is not dead , Centos 8 is dead
, Centos 8
>>>>>> stream is live and is the focus , Centos 9 is coming
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
https://freedomben.medium.com/centos-is-not-dead-please-stop-saying-it-is-at-least-until-you-read-this-4b26b5c44877
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> lie!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> stream is not suitable for any production use
>>>>
>>>> people telling me that about Fedora again and again while i
drive a
>>>> whole infrastructure from firewalls over storages to servers
since
>>>> 2088 on Fedora.....
>>>
>>> Well, you are from future.
>>
>> 2008
> 
> patch accepted.
> 
>>
>>> I run Linux servers from 1999 though ;-)
>>
>> that's not the point
>>
>> i am simply tired about all the guys not capable walking on their own 
>> feet and rely on "there will be no visible change within the next
10
>> years"
>>
>> if you think something is not suitable for any production usage the 
>> reason maybe because you lack automation and tests for your stuff and 
>> instead rely on "never touch a running system"
> 
> 
> when you need to drive at leat 4 hours one way in case server is dead 
> you have different opinion :-)
when you have to drive just because of a software problem you don't have 
infrastructure which deserves the name "production" at all

even if one hosts explodes as long it's pieces don't hit the others 
should have no impact to production

ILO, VPN, HA exists.....

i have not seen the servers in the second office 300 kilometers from 
here physically since they where installed in vienna years ago and have 
never seen the building there at all

17.02.2021 14:16, Reindl Harald ?????:
>
>> when you need to drive at leat 4 hours one way in case server is dead 
>> you have different opinion :-)
>
> when you have to drive just because of a software problem you don't 
> have infrastructure which deserves the name "production" at all
>
> even if one hosts explodes as long it's pieces don't hit the others
> should have no impact to production
>
> ILO, VPN, HA exists.....
>
> i have not seen the servers in the second office 300 kilometers from 
> here physically since they where installed in vienna years ago and 
> have never seen the building there at all

If you don't understand that there are server usage scenarios different 
then you have,

if you don't understand that only option can be only 3g mobile channel - 
we have nothing to talk about.