Hi Louis - On 10/6/21 06:37, L. van Belle via samba wrote:> Hai, > > Thanks for reporting this people. > I'll add the patch package to the samba in the next 4.14/4.15 packages > > On below, i have the same in the 4.14 packages and if i recall correctly, > Its not available atm in 4.14.x > > I "thought" its ready in 4.15 but i havent tested/checked it yet. > > And a small reminder for the people that already start upgrading there > servers.. > I use this for a reason, most know my policy with the packages and version > numbering. > > .0 is a test server. > .1 is preffered an auth only server. > .2 is the first member server with shares/printing. > .3 is the first AD-DC. > > Follow this path and your pretty safe with upgrades and things "not" working > suddenly. > Only if a .0 tests are ok, then i repeat is like its a .1 release and so on. > > I can tell you folks, that, in that last 4 years, > only 2 or 1 X.XX.0 release made it to DC upgrade. >It sounds like you are telling us to NOT use 4.15.0 for a DC installation? Since 4.14 was just patched to 4.14.8, this might be a safer choice all around. Does anyone know what features one will be missing out on by sticking to 4.14.x for now?> > Greetz, > > Louis > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens >> Daniel Lopes de Carvalho via samba >> Verzonden: woensdag 6 oktober 2021 13:18 >> Aan: Rowland Penny >> CC: sambalist >> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba 4.14 upgrade schema to 2012_R2 error >> >> Hi Rowland. >> >> Sorry for my failure. I was looking for a samba-patch package in Van >> Belle's repo. And thanks for your pacience to explain and for >> your answer. >> >> I have installed the patch package and I succeeded in >> upgrading the schema. >> Thanks again. >> >> Now I'm trying to update the domain level to 2012_R2, but it >> is still in >> 2008_R2 after the commands. Find bellow the command I have used: >> >> I have used the following commands: >> samba-tool domain level show >> >> Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=example,DC=com' >> Forest function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 >> Domain function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 >> Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2008 R2 >> >> samba-tool domain level raise >> All changes applied successfully! >> >> samba-tool domain level show >> Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=example,DC=com' >> Forest function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 >> Domain function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 >> Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2008 R2 >> >> samba-tool domain level raise --domain-level=2012_R2 >> ERROR: Domain function level can't be higher than the lowest >> function level >> of a DC! >> >> samba-tool domain level raise --forest-level=2012_R2 >> ERROR: Forest function level can't be higher than the domain function >> level(s). Please raise it/them first! >> >> Could you, please, help me with it? >> >> Thanks again! >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >> >> > >
Hai Patrick,> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Patrick Goetz via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 6 oktober 2021 14:13 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba 4.14 upgrade schema to 2012_R2 error > > Hi Louis - > > On 10/6/21 06:37, L. van Belle via samba wrote: > > Hai, > > > > Thanks for reporting this people. > > I'll add the patch package to the samba in the next > 4.14/4.15 packages > > > > On below, i have the same in the 4.14 packages and if i > recall correctly, > > Its not available atm in 4.14.x > > > > I "thought" its ready in 4.15 but i havent tested/checked it yet. > > > > And a small reminder for the people that already start > upgrading there > > servers.. > > I use this for a reason, most know my policy with the > packages and version > > numbering. > > > > .0 is a test server. > > .1 is preffered an auth only server. > > .2 is the first member server with shares/printing. > > .3 is the first AD-DC. > > > > Follow this path and your pretty safe with upgrades and > things "not" working > > suddenly. > > Only if a .0 tests are ok, then i repeat is like its a .1 > release and so on. > > > > I can tell you folks, that, in that last 4 years, > > only 2 or 1 X.XX.0 release made it to DC upgrade. > > > > It sounds like you are telling us to NOT use 4.15.0 for a DC > installation? > > Since 4.14 was just patched to 4.14.8, this might be a safer > choice all around. Does anyone know what features one will > be missing out on by sticking to 4.14.x for now?Changelog ;-) that tell's what you miss. ;-) And no, what im saying is to test before you roll out a new major release to "any" production server. I only got to testing on a test server atm, because im having back problems, an old injury is bugging me because of that so im less behind pc. What i showed is the general path i follow, i use it for years now and i concider that safe, but im not you, My network is different, so setup a way that fits your environment. Im eager to goto 4.15 also because it has things i need, just.. The bigger the changes compaired to previous version, the better you should test. Thats all i can say. +, 4.14.8 is building currenlty, i just uploaded Ubuntu Focal Fossa. Buster 4.14.8 will be online later today, thats currently building the last arch. Bullseye 4.14.8 will be online tomorrow, So far, Greetz, Louis