> On 15 Jan 2021, at 16:11, Rowland penny via samba <samba at
lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> On 15/01/2021 14:54, Piotr Maksymiuk wrote:
>>
>>> On 15 Jan 2021, at 10:41, Rowland penny via samba <samba at
lists.samba.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 14/01/2021 22:53, Piotr Maksymiuk via samba wrote:
>>>> I've started using samba with OpenZFS on Debian, but it
seems I need zfsacl to go along with fruit for it not to complain about not
being able to write some ACL metadata. Would it be possible to include it
somehow? I'm using zfs stuff from buster-backports. I've tried using
vfs_acl_xattr and the errors went away, but then samba stops respecting the
setuid ACL. I'm thinking zfsacl should fix that (maybe?)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Piotr
>>> To be honest, I cannot recommend using ZFS with Samba, FreeBSD
defaults to ZFS and they have multiple problems with Samba.
>>>
>>> Rowland
>>>
>> Could you elaborate? It was my experiments with TrueNAS (FBSD based)
that led me to switch, and with ZOL 2.0 becoming the ZFS implementation on all
OSes [1] and TrueNAS coming out with a Linux version [2] I can see user adoption
rising. I know TrueNAS had a bunch of custom patches [3], but haven't
tracked down what they do on SCALE yet. However I saw a glimpse of them
promising to commit more stuff upstream in their issue tracked
>>
>> [1]
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OpenZFS-2.0-Released
>> [2]
https://www.truenas.com/community/threads/truenas-scale-release-plan.87266/
>> [3]
https://github.com/freenas/ports/tree/freenas/master/net/samba/files
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Peter
>
> I am not saying that you cannot use ZFS, I am saying that I wouldn't
use it with Samba. There have been numerous problems reported from FreeBSD about
ACL problems.
>
> Rowland
>
>
Fair enough, but that was before ZOL. Old OpenZFS (pre-ZOL) used NFSv4-style
ACLs. Now the situation is reversed, ZOL uses posixacl (with everyone wanting
ACLs using them), with nfsv4acl in the works.