Andrew Bartlett
2020-Dec-01 22:23 UTC
[Samba] Strange logs: check_usershare_stat: file /var/lib/samba/usershares/ owned by uid 0 is not a regular file
On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 14:19 -0800, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote:> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:08:34PM +0000, Rowland penny via samba > wrote: > > > could this have anything to do with it: > > > > 4.12.0 > > Default: usershare max shares = 0 > > > > 4.13.2 > > Default: usershare max shares = 100 > > Good catch. Yes, that would cause > the usershare load path to be executed > now whereas it wasn't before.Even if we didn't change the default, Debian does. But the code should work of course, be it enabled by default or by the administrator... Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett (he/him) https://samba.org/~abartlet/ Samba Team Member (since 2001) https://samba.org Samba Team Lead, Catalyst IT https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
Rowland penny
2020-Dec-01 22:32 UTC
[Samba] Strange logs: check_usershare_stat: file /var/lib/samba/usershares/ owned by uid 0 is not a regular file
On 01/12/2020 22:23, Andrew Bartlett wrote:> On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 14:19 -0800, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:08:34PM +0000, Rowland penny via samba >> wrote: >> >>> could this have anything to do with it: >>> >>> 4.12.0 >>> Default: usershare max shares = 0 >>> >>> 4.13.2 >>> Default: usershare max shares = 100 >> Good catch. Yes, that would cause >> the usershare load path to be executed >> now whereas it wasn't before. > Even if we didn't change the default, Debian does. But the code should > work of course, be it enabled by default or by the administrator... > > Andrew BartlettYes, it is Debian, just found this out by downloading the relevant file from Louis's repo, they appear to be turning usershares on without actually setting up usershares. I would suggest the code would work if usershares were actually set up correctly, I have used usershares in the past and I don't remember syslog getting spammed. Rowland