mabi
2020-Oct-26 14:09 UTC
[Gluster-users] Upgrade from 6.9 to 7.7 stuck (peer is rejected)
??????? Original Message ??????? On Monday, October 26, 2020 2:56 PM, Diego Zuccato <diego.zuccato at unibo.it> wrote:> The volume is built by 26 10TB disks w/ genetic data. I currently don't > have exact numbers, but it's still at the beginning, so there are a bit > less than 10TB actually used. > But you're only removing the arbiters, you always have two copies of > your files. The worst that can happen is a split brain condition > (avoidable by requiring a 2-nodes quorum, in that case the worst is that > the volume goes readonly).Right, seen liked that this sounds reasonable. Do you actually remember the exact command you ran in order to remove the brick? I was thinking this should be it: gluster volume remove-brick <VOLNAME> <BRICK> force but should I use "force" or "start"?> IIRC it took about 3 days, but the arbiters are on a VM (8CPU, 8GB RAM) > that uses an iSCSI disk. More than 80% continuous load on both CPUs and RAM.That's quite long I must say and I am in the same case as you, my arbiter is a VM.
Diego Zuccato
2020-Oct-26 14:39 UTC
[Gluster-users] Upgrade from 6.9 to 7.7 stuck (peer is rejected)
Il 26/10/20 15:09, mabi ha scritto:> Right, seen liked that this sounds reasonable. Do you actually remember the exact command you ran in order to remove the brick? I was thinking this should be it: > gluster volume remove-brick <VOLNAME> <BRICK> force > but should I use "force" or "start"?Memory does not serve me well (there are 28 disks, not 26!), but bash history does :) # gluster volume remove-brick BigVol replica 2 str957-biostq:/srv/arbiters/{00..27}/BigVol force # gluster peer detach str957-biostq # gluster peer probe str957-biostq # gluster volume add-brick BigVol replica 3 arbiter 1 str957-biostq:/srv/arbiters/{00..27}/BigVol You obviously have to wait for remove-brick to complete before detaching arbiter.>> IIRC it took about 3 days, but the arbiters are on a VM (8CPU, 8GB RAM) >> that uses an iSCSI disk. More than 80% continuous load on both CPUs and RAM. > That's quite long I must say and I am in the same case as you, my arbiter is a VM.Give all the CPU and RAM you can. Less than 8GB RAM is asking for troubles (in my case). -- Diego Zuccato DIFA - Dip. di Fisica e Astronomia Servizi Informatici Alma Mater Studiorum - Universit? di Bologna V.le Berti-Pichat 6/2 - 40127 Bologna - Italy tel.: +39 051 20 95786