Strahil Nikolov
2020-Apr-30 14:44 UTC
[Gluster-users] Extremely slow file listing in folders with many files
On April 30, 2020 4:24:23 AM GMT+03:00, Artem Russakovskii <archon810 at gmail.com> wrote:>Hi all, > >We have 500GB and 10TB 4x1 replicate xfs-based gluster volumes, and the >10TB one especially is extremely slow to do certain things with (and >has >been since gluster 3.x when we started). We're currently on 5.13. > >The number of files isn't even what I'd consider that great - under >100k >per dir. > >Here are some numbers to look at: > >On gluster volume in a dir of 45k files: >The first time > >time find | wc -l >45423 >real 8m44.819s >user 0m0.459s >sys 0m0.998s > >And again > >time find | wc -l >45423 >real 0m34.677s >user 0m0.291s >sys 0m0.754s > > >If I run the same operation on the xfs block device itself: >The first time > >time find | wc -l >45423 >real 0m13.514s >user 0m0.144s >sys 0m0.501s > >And again > >time find | wc -l >45423 >real 0m0.197s >user 0m0.088s >sys 0m0.106s > > >I'd expect a performance difference here but just as it was several >years >ago when we started with gluster, it's still huge, and simple file >listings >are incredibly slow. > >At the time, the team was looking to do some optimizations, but I'm not >sure this has happened. > >What can we do to try to improve performance? > >Thank you. > > > >Some setup values follow. > >xfs_info /mnt/SNIP_block1 >meta-data=/dev/sdc isize=512 agcount=103, >agsize=26214400 >blks > = sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1 > = crc=1 finobt=1, sparse=0, rmapbt=0 > = reflink=0 >data = bsize=4096 blocks=2684354560, >imaxpct=25 > = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks >naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0, ftype=1 >log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=51200, version=2 > = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1 >realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0 > >Volume Name: SNIP_data1 >Type: Replicate >Volume ID: SNIP >Status: Started >Snapshot Count: 0 >Number of Bricks: 1 x 4 = 4 >Transport-type: tcp >Bricks: >Brick1: nexus2:/mnt/SNIP_block1/SNIP_data1 >Brick2: forge:/mnt/SNIP_block1/SNIP_data1 >Brick3: hive:/mnt/SNIP_block1/SNIP_data1 >Brick4: citadel:/mnt/SNIP_block1/SNIP_data1 >Options Reconfigured: >cluster.quorum-count: 1 >cluster.quorum-type: fixed >network.ping-timeout: 5 >network.remote-dio: enable >performance.rda-cache-limit: 256MB >performance.readdir-ahead: on >performance.parallel-readdir: on >network.inode-lru-limit: 500000 >performance.md-cache-timeout: 600 >performance.cache-invalidation: on >performance.stat-prefetch: on >features.cache-invalidation-timeout: 600 >features.cache-invalidation: on >cluster.readdir-optimize: on >performance.io-thread-count: 32 >server.event-threads: 4 >client.event-threads: 4 >performance.read-ahead: off >cluster.lookup-optimize: on >performance.cache-size: 1GB >cluster.self-heal-daemon: enable >transport.address-family: inet >nfs.disable: on >performance.client-io-threads: on >cluster.granular-entry-heal: enable >cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm: full > >Sincerely, >Artem > >-- >Founder, Android Police <http://www.androidpolice.com>, APK Mirror ><http://www.apkmirror.com/>, Illogical Robot LLC >beerpla.net | @ArtemR <http://twitter.com/ArtemR>Hi Artem, Have you checked the same on brick level ? How big is the difference ? Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov
Artem Russakovskii
2020-Apr-30 15:27 UTC
[Gluster-users] Extremely slow file listing in folders with many files
Hi Strahil, in the original email I included both the times for the first and subsequent reads on the fuse mounted gluster volume as well as the xfs filesystem the gluster data resides on (this is the brick, right?). On Thu, Apr 30, 2020, 7:44 AM Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com> wrote:> On April 30, 2020 4:24:23 AM GMT+03:00, Artem Russakovskii < > archon810 at gmail.com> wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >We have 500GB and 10TB 4x1 replicate xfs-based gluster volumes, and the > >10TB one especially is extremely slow to do certain things with (and > >has > >been since gluster 3.x when we started). We're currently on 5.13. > > > >The number of files isn't even what I'd consider that great - under > >100k > >per dir. > > > >Here are some numbers to look at: > > > >On gluster volume in a dir of 45k files: > >The first time > > > >time find | wc -l > >45423 > >real 8m44.819s > >user 0m0.459s > >sys 0m0.998s > > > >And again > > > >time find | wc -l > >45423 > >real 0m34.677s > >user 0m0.291s > >sys 0m0.754s > > > > > >If I run the same operation on the xfs block device itself: > >The first time > > > >time find | wc -l > >45423 > >real 0m13.514s > >user 0m0.144s > >sys 0m0.501s > > > >And again > > > >time find | wc -l > >45423 > >real 0m0.197s > >user 0m0.088s > >sys 0m0.106s > > > > > >I'd expect a performance difference here but just as it was several > >years > >ago when we started with gluster, it's still huge, and simple file > >listings > >are incredibly slow. > > > >At the time, the team was looking to do some optimizations, but I'm not > >sure this has happened. > > > >What can we do to try to improve performance? > > > >Thank you. > > > > > > > >Some setup values follow. > > > >xfs_info /mnt/SNIP_block1 > >meta-data=/dev/sdc isize=512 agcount=103, > >agsize=26214400 > >blks > > = sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1 > > = crc=1 finobt=1, sparse=0, rmapbt=0 > > = reflink=0 > >data = bsize=4096 blocks=2684354560, > >imaxpct=25 > > = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks > >naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0, ftype=1 > >log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=51200, version=2 > > = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1 > >realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0 > > > >Volume Name: SNIP_data1 > >Type: Replicate > >Volume ID: SNIP > >Status: Started > >Snapshot Count: 0 > >Number of Bricks: 1 x 4 = 4 > >Transport-type: tcp > >Bricks: > >Brick1: nexus2:/mnt/SNIP_block1/SNIP_data1 > >Brick2: forge:/mnt/SNIP_block1/SNIP_data1 > >Brick3: hive:/mnt/SNIP_block1/SNIP_data1 > >Brick4: citadel:/mnt/SNIP_block1/SNIP_data1 > >Options Reconfigured: > >cluster.quorum-count: 1 > >cluster.quorum-type: fixed > >network.ping-timeout: 5 > >network.remote-dio: enable > >performance.rda-cache-limit: 256MB > >performance.readdir-ahead: on > >performance.parallel-readdir: on > >network.inode-lru-limit: 500000 > >performance.md-cache-timeout: 600 > >performance.cache-invalidation: on > >performance.stat-prefetch: on > >features.cache-invalidation-timeout: 600 > >features.cache-invalidation: on > >cluster.readdir-optimize: on > >performance.io-thread-count: 32 > >server.event-threads: 4 > >client.event-threads: 4 > >performance.read-ahead: off > >cluster.lookup-optimize: on > >performance.cache-size: 1GB > >cluster.self-heal-daemon: enable > >transport.address-family: inet > >nfs.disable: on > >performance.client-io-threads: on > >cluster.granular-entry-heal: enable > >cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm: full > > > >Sincerely, > >Artem > > > >-- > >Founder, Android Police <http://www.androidpolice.com>, APK Mirror > ><http://www.apkmirror.com/>, Illogical Robot LLC > >beerpla.net | @ArtemR <http://twitter.com/ArtemR> > > Hi Artem, > > Have you checked the same on brick level ? How big is the difference ? > > Best Regards, > Strahil Nikolov >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20200430/14baedb1/attachment.html>