I made the following changes for small file performance as suggested by
http://blog.gluster.org/gluster-tiering-and-small-file-performance/
I am still seeing du -sh /data/shared taking 39 minutes.
Any other tuning I can do. Most of my files are 15K. Here is sample of
small files with size and number of occurrences
FileSize. # of occurrence
==== ===========
1.1K 1122
1.1M 1040
1.2K 1281
1.2M 1357
1.3K 1149
1.3M 1098
1.4K 1119
1.5K 1189
1.6K 1036
1.7K 1169
11K 2157
12K 2398
13K 2402
14K 2406*15K 2426*
16K 2386
17K 1986
18K 2037
19K 1829
2.0K 1027
2.1K 1048
2.4K 1013
20K 1585
21K 1713
22K 1590
23K 1371
24K 1428
25K 1444
26K 1391
27K 1217
28K 1485
29K 1282
30K 1303
31K 1275
32K 1296
33K 1058
36K 1023
37K 1107
39K 1092
41K 1034
42K 1187
46K 1030
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 5:30 PM <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> time du -sh /data/shared
>
> 431G /data/shared
>
> real 45m49.992s
> user 0m20.043s
> sys 2m32.456s
>
>
> gluster fs is extremely slow
>
> Any suggestions on what settings to change to improve it?
>
>
> --
> Asif Iqbal
> PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>
>
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20200526/a27697fd/attachment.html>