It may be stable, but it still suffers from performance issues, which the
team is working on. But nevertheless, I'm curious if maybe Ceph has those
problem sorted by now.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020, 9:27 PM Dmitry Melekhov <dm at belkam.com> wrote:
> 17.06.2020 01:06, Mahdi Adnan ?????:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm wondering what's the current and future plan for Gluster
project
> > overall, I see that the project is not as busy as it was before
"at
> > least this is what I'm seeing" Like there are fewer blogs
about what
> > the roadmap or future plans of the project, the deprecation of
> > Glusterd2, even Red Hat Openshift storage switched to Ceph.
> > As the community of this project, do you feel the same? Is the
> > deprecation of Glusterd2 concerning? Do you feel that the project is
> > slowing down somehow? Do you think Red Hat is abandoning the project
> > or giving fewer resources to Gluster?
> >
>
> Gluster2 was mistake, imho. It's deprecation means nothing.
>
> For me looks like gluster in now stable , this is why it is not as busy
> as before.
>
>
>
> ________
>
>
>
> Community Meeting Calendar:
>
> Schedule -
> Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
> Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968
>
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20200616/67c069a4/attachment.html>