The committing should happen a little earlier than 10th. The tagging is the
one which decides if the patch makes it to the release or not and tagging
happens before 10th. We do announce the tagging date for each release in
the mailing list. You can keep an eye on that to know the dates. And
committing in master won't be enough for it to make it to a release. If it
has to be a part of release 6 then after being committed into master we
have to back port it to the release 6 branch and it should get committed in
that particular branch as well. Only then it will be a part of the package
released for that branch.
On Wed, 19 Jun, 2019, 4:24 AM David Cunningham, <dcunningham at
voisonics.com>
wrote:
> Hi Hari,
>
> Thanks for that information. So if I understand correctly, if thin-arbiter
> is committed to the master branch by the 10th July, then it should be in
> the CentOS package fairly soon afterwards?
>
> I have a customer asking when we can use it, hence the questions. Thank
> you.
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 17:24, Hari Gowtham <hgowtham at redhat.com>
wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Once a feature is added to the master branch, we have to back port it
to
>> the release 5, 6 and other such branches which are active. And these
>> release branches will be tagged every month around 10th. So if an
feature
>> has been back ported to the particular release branch before tagging,
then
>> it will be a part of the tagging. And this tag is the one used for
creating
>> packaging. This is the procedure for CentOS, Fedora and Debian.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hari.
>>
>> On Tue, 18 Jun, 2019, 4:06 AM David Cunningham, <
>> dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ashish,
>>>
>>> Thanks for that. I guess it's not your responsibility, but do
you know
>>> how often it typically takes for new versions to reach the CentOS
package
>>> system after being released?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 17:15, Ashish Pandey <aspandey at
redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi David,
>>>>
>>>> It should be any time soon as we are in last phase of patch
reviews.
>>>> You can follow this patch -
>>>> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/22612/
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> Ashish
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> *From: *"David Cunningham" <dcunningham at
voisonics.com>
>>>> *To: *"Ashish Pandey" <aspandey at redhat.com>
>>>> *Cc: *"gluster-users" <gluster-users at
gluster.org>
>>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, June 11, 2019 9:55:40 AM
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [Gluster-users] Thin-arbiter questions
>>>>
>>>> Hi Ashish and Amar,
>>>>
>>>> Is there any news on when thin-arbiter might be in the regular
>>>> GlusterFS, and the CentOS packages please?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your help.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 20:34, Ashish Pandey <aspandey at
redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> *From: *"David Cunningham" <dcunningham at
voisonics.com>
>>>>> *To: *"Ashish Pandey" <aspandey at
redhat.com>
>>>>> *Cc: *"gluster-users" <gluster-users at
gluster.org>
>>>>> *Sent: *Monday, May 6, 2019 1:40:30 PM
>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [Gluster-users] Thin-arbiter questions
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Ashish,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for the update. Does that mean they're now in
the regular
>>>>> Glusterfs? Any idea how long it typically takes the Ubuntu
and CentOS
>>>>> packages to be updated with the latest code?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, for regular glusterd, work is still in progress. It
will be done
>>>>> soon.
>>>>> I don't have answer for the next question. May be Amar
have
>>>>> information regarding this. Adding him in CC.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 18:21, Ashish Pandey <aspandey at
redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can see that Amar has already committed the changes
and those are
>>>>>> visible on
>>>>>>
https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Thin-Arbiter-Volumes/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Ashish
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> *From: *"Strahil" <hunter86_bg at
yahoo.com>
>>>>>> *To: *"Ashish" <aspandey at
redhat.com>, "David" <
>>>>>> dcunningham at voisonics.com>
>>>>>> *Cc: *"gluster-users" <gluster-users at
gluster.org>
>>>>>> *Sent: *Saturday, May 4, 2019 12:10:01 AM
>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [Gluster-users] Thin-arbiter questions
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Ashish,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can someone commit the doc change I have already
proposed ?
>>>>>> At least, the doc will clarify that fact .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>> Strahil Nikolov
>>>>>> On May 3, 2019 05:30, Ashish Pandey <aspandey at
redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi David,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Creation of thin-arbiter volume is currently supported
by GD2 only.
>>>>>> The command "glustercli" is available when
glusterd2 is running.
>>>>>> We are also working on providing thin-arbiter support
on glusted
>>>>>> however, it is not available right now.
>>>>>> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/22612/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Ashish
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> *From: *"David Cunningham" <dcunningham at
voisonics.com>
>>>>>> *To: *gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>>> *Sent: *Friday, May 3, 2019 7:40:03 AM
>>>>>> *Subject: *[Gluster-users] Thin-arbiter questions
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We are setting up a thin-arbiter and hope someone can
help with some
>>>>>> questions. We've been following the documentation
from
>>>>>>
https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Thin-Arbiter-Volumes/
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. What release of 5.x supports thin-arbiter? We tried
a "gluster
>>>>>> volume create" with the --thin-arbiter option on
5.5 and got an
>>>>>> "unrecognized option --thin-arbiter" error.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. The instruction to create a new volume with a
thin-arbiter is
>>>>>> clear. How do you add a thin-arbiter to an already
existing volume though?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3. The documentation suggests running glusterfsd
manually to start
>>>>>> the thin-arbiter. Is there a service that can do this
instead? I found a
>>>>>> mention of one in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579786
>>>>>> but it's not really documented.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks in advance for your help,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited
>>>>>> http://voisonics.com/
>>>>>> USA: +1 213 221 1092
>>>>>> New Zealand: +64 (0)28 2558 3782
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>>>
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>>>
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited
>>>>> http://voisonics.com/
>>>>> USA: +1 213 221 1092
>>>>> New Zealand: +64 (0)28 2558 3782
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited
>>>> http://voisonics.com/
>>>> USA: +1 213 221 1092
>>>> New Zealand: +64 (0)28 2558 3782
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited
>>> http://voisonics.com/
>>> USA: +1 213 221 1092
>>> New Zealand: +64 (0)28 2558 3782
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>
>>
>
> --
> David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited
> http://voisonics.com/
> USA: +1 213 221 1092
> New Zealand: +64 (0)28 2558 3782
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20190619/1f7d9374/attachment.html>