Karli Sjöberg
2018-Aug-10 13:08 UTC
[Gluster-users] ganesha.nfsd process dies when copying files
On Fri, 2018-08-10 at 08:39 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:> On 08/10/2018 08:08 AM, Karli Sj?berg wrote: > > Hey all! > > ... > > > > glusterfs-client-xlators-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 > > glusterfs-api-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 > > nfs-ganesha-2.4.5-1.el7.x86_64 > > centos-release-gluster310-1.0-1.el7.centos.noarch > > glusterfs-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 > > glusterfs-cli-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 > > nfs-ganesha-gluster-2.4.5-1.el7.x86_64 > > glusterfs-server-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 > > glusterfs-libs-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 > > glusterfs-fuse-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 > > glusterfs-ganesha-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 > > > > For nfs-ganesha problems you'd really be better served by posting to > support@ or devel at lists.nfs-ganesha.org. > > Both glusterfs-3.10 and nfs-ganesha-2.4 are really old. glusterfs- > 3.10 > is even officially EOL. Ganesha isn't really organized enough to > have > done anything as bold as officially declaring 2.4 as having reached > EOL. > > The nfs-ganesha devs are currently working on 2.7; maintaining and > supporting 2.6, and less so 2.5, is pretty much at the limit of what > they might be willing to help debug. > > I strongly encourage you to update to a more recent version of both > glusterfs and nfs-ganesha. glusterfs-4.1 and nfs-ganesha-2.6 would > be > ideal. Then if you still have problems you're much more likely to get > help. >Hi, thank you for your answer, but it raises even more questions about any potential production deployment. Actually, I knew that the versions are old, but it seems to me that you are contradicting yourself: https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-July/031753.html "After 3.10 you'd need to use storhaug.... Which.... doesn't work (yet). You need to use 3.10 for now." So how is that supposed to work? Is there documentation for how to get there? Thanks in advance! /K -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180810/c3f6ce32/attachment.sig>
Pui Edylie
2018-Aug-10 13:23 UTC
[Gluster-users] ganesha.nfsd process dies when copying files
Hi Karli, Storhaug works with glusterfs 4.1.2 and latest nfs-ganesha. I just installed them last weekend ... they are working very well :) Cheers, Edy On 8/10/2018 9:08 PM, Karli Sj?berg wrote:> On Fri, 2018-08-10 at 08:39 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >> On 08/10/2018 08:08 AM, Karli Sj?berg wrote: >>> Hey all! >>> ... >>> >>> glusterfs-client-xlators-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >>> glusterfs-api-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >>> nfs-ganesha-2.4.5-1.el7.x86_64 >>> centos-release-gluster310-1.0-1.el7.centos.noarch >>> glusterfs-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >>> glusterfs-cli-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >>> nfs-ganesha-gluster-2.4.5-1.el7.x86_64 >>> glusterfs-server-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >>> glusterfs-libs-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >>> glusterfs-fuse-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >>> glusterfs-ganesha-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >>> >> For nfs-ganesha problems you'd really be better served by posting to >> support@ or devel at lists.nfs-ganesha.org. >> >> Both glusterfs-3.10 and nfs-ganesha-2.4 are really old. glusterfs- >> 3.10 >> is even officially EOL. Ganesha isn't really organized enough to >> have >> done anything as bold as officially declaring 2.4 as having reached >> EOL. >> >> The nfs-ganesha devs are currently working on 2.7; maintaining and >> supporting 2.6, and less so 2.5, is pretty much at the limit of what >> they might be willing to help debug. >> >> I strongly encourage you to update to a more recent version of both >> glusterfs and nfs-ganesha. glusterfs-4.1 and nfs-ganesha-2.6 would >> be >> ideal. Then if you still have problems you're much more likely to get >> help. >> > Hi, thank you for your answer, but it raises even more questions about > any potential production deployment. > > Actually, I knew that the versions are old, but it seems to me that you > are contradicting yourself: > > https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-July/031753.html > > "After 3.10 you'd need to use storhaug.... Which.... doesn't work > (yet). > > You need to use 3.10 for now." > > So how is that supposed to work? > > Is there documentation for how to get there? > > Thanks in advance! > > /K > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180810/9ffb8dbf/attachment.html>
Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
2018-Aug-10 13:36 UTC
[Gluster-users] ganesha.nfsd process dies when copying files
On 08/10/2018 09:08 AM, Karli Sj?berg wrote:> On Fri, 2018-08-10 at 08:39 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >> On 08/10/2018 08:08 AM, Karli Sj?berg wrote: >>> Hey all! >>> ... >>> >>> glusterfs-client-xlators-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >>> glusterfs-api-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >>> nfs-ganesha-2.4.5-1.el7.x86_64 >>> centos-release-gluster310-1.0-1.el7.centos.noarch >>> glusterfs-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >>> glusterfs-cli-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >>> nfs-ganesha-gluster-2.4.5-1.el7.x86_64 >>> glusterfs-server-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >>> glusterfs-libs-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >>> glusterfs-fuse-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >>> glusterfs-ganesha-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 >>> >> >> For nfs-ganesha problems you'd really be better served by posting to >> support@ or devel at lists.nfs-ganesha.org. >> >> Both glusterfs-3.10 and nfs-ganesha-2.4 are really old. glusterfs- >> 3.10 >> is even officially EOL. Ganesha isn't really organized enough to >> have >> done anything as bold as officially declaring 2.4 as having reached >> EOL. >> >> The nfs-ganesha devs are currently working on 2.7; maintaining and >> supporting 2.6, and less so 2.5, is pretty much at the limit of what >> they might be willing to help debug. >> >> I strongly encourage you to update to a more recent version of both >> glusterfs and nfs-ganesha. glusterfs-4.1 and nfs-ganesha-2.6 would >> be >> ideal. Then if you still have problems you're much more likely to get >> help. >> > > Hi, thank you for your answer, but it raises even more questions about > any potential production deployment. > > Actually, I knew that the versions are old, but it seems to me that you > are contradicting yourself: > > https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-July/031753.html > > "After 3.10 you'd need to use storhaug.... Which.... doesn't work > (yet). >I don't recall the context of that email. But I did also send this email https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2018-June/054896.html announcing the availability of (working) storhaug-1.0. There are packages in Fedora, CentOS Storage SIG, gluster's Launchpad PPA, gluster's OBS, and for Debian on download.gluster.org. -- Kaleb -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180810/7bbf0337/attachment.sig>