Daryl lee
2017-Jan-13 00:18 UTC
[Gluster-users] CentOS Storage SIG Repo for 3.8 is behind 3 versions (3.8.5). Is it still being used and can I help?
Hey Gluster Community, According to the community packages list I get the impression that 3.8 would be released to the CentOS Storage SIG Repo, but this seems to have stopped with 3.8.5 and 3.9 is still missing all together. However, 3.7 is still being updated and is at 3.7.8 so I am confused why the other two versions have stopped. I did some looking on the past posts to this list and found a conversation about 3.9 on the CentOS repo last year but it looks like it's still not up yet; possibly due to a lack of community involvement in the testing and reporting back to whoever the maintainer is (which we don't know yet)? I might be in a position to help since I have a test environment that mirrors my production environment setup that I would use for testing the patch anyways, I might as well provide some good to the community.. At this point I know to do " yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster38-test glusterfs-server" but I'm not sure who to tell if it works or not, and what kind of info they are looking for. If someone wanted to give me a little guidance that would be awesome, especially if it will save me from having to switch to manually downloading packages. I guess the basic question is do we expect releases to resume for 3.8 on the CentOS Storage SIG repo or should I be looking to move to manual patching for 3.8. Additionally, if the person who does the releases to the CentOS Storage SIG is waiting for someone to tell them it looks fine, who should I contact to do so? Thanks! Daryl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170112/20d5f7ee/attachment.html>
Pavel Szalbot
2017-Jan-13 10:01 UTC
[Gluster-users] CentOS Storage SIG Repo for 3.8 is behind 3 versions (3.8.5). Is it still being used and can I help?
Hi, you can install 3.8.7 from centos-gluster38-test using: yum --enablerepo=centos-gluster38-test install glusterfs I am not sure how QA works for CentOS Storage SIG, but 3.8.7 works same as 3.8.5 for me - libvirt gfapi is unfortunately broken, no other problems detected. Btw 3.9 is short term maintenance release ( https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2016-September/015197.html). -ps On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Daryl lee <daryllee at ece.ucsb.edu> wrote:> Hey Gluster Community, > > According to the community packages list I get the impression that 3.8 > would be released to the CentOS Storage SIG Repo, but this seems to have > stopped with 3.8.5 and 3.9 is still missing all together. However, 3.7 is > still being updated and is at 3.7.8 so I am confused why the other two > versions have stopped. > > > > I did some looking on the past posts to this list and found a conversation > about 3.9 on the CentOS repo last year but it looks like it's still not up > yet; possibly due to a lack of community involvement in the testing and > reporting back to whoever the maintainer is (which we don?t know yet)? I > might be in a position to help since I have a test environment that mirrors > my production environment setup that I would use for testing the patch > anyways, I might as well provide some good to the community.. At this > point I know to do " yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster38-test > glusterfs-server" but I'm not sure who to tell if it works or not, and what > kind of info they are looking for. If someone wanted to give me a little > guidance that would be awesome, especially if it will save me from having > to switch to manually downloading packages. > > > > I guess the basic question is do we expect releases to resume for 3.8 on > the CentOS Storage SIG repo or should I be looking to move to manual > patching for 3.8. Additionally, if the person who does the releases to the > CentOS Storage SIG is waiting for someone to tell them it looks fine, who > should I contact to do so? > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Daryl > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170113/2a0e037d/attachment.html>