baul jianguo
2016-Jan-25  07:33 UTC
[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS FUSE client hangs on rsyncing lots of file
3.5.7 also hangs.only the flush op hung. Yes,off the performance.client-io-threads ,no hang. The hang does not relate the client kernel version. One client statdump about flush op,any abnormal? [global.callpool.stack.12] uid=0 gid=0 pid=14432 unique=16336007098 lk-owner=77cb199aa36f3641 op=FLUSH type=1 cnt=6 [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.1] ref_count=1 translator=fuse complete=0 [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.2] ref_count=0 translator=datavolume-write-behind complete=0 parent=datavolume-read-ahead wind_from=ra_flush wind_to=FIRST_CHILD (this)->fops->flush unwind_to=ra_flush_cbk [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.3] ref_count=1 translator=datavolume-read-ahead complete=0 parent=datavolume-open-behind wind_from=default_flush_resume wind_to=FIRST_CHILD(this)->fops->flush unwind_to=default_flush_cbk [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.4] ref_count=1 translator=datavolume-open-behind complete=0 parent=datavolume-io-threads wind_from=iot_flush_wrapper wind_to=FIRST_CHILD(this)->fops->flush unwind_to=iot_flush_cbk [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.5] ref_count=1 translator=datavolume-io-threads complete=0 parent=datavolume wind_from=io_stats_flush wind_to=FIRST_CHILD(this)->fops->flush unwind_to=io_stats_flush_cbk [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.6] ref_count=1 translator=datavolume complete=0 parent=fuse wind_from=fuse_flush_resume wind_to=xl->fops->flush unwind_to=fuse_err_cbk On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr at natalenko.name> wrote:> With "performance.client-io-threads" set to "off" no hangs occurred in 3 > rsync/rm rounds. Could that be some fuse-bridge lock race? Will bring that > option to "on" back again and try to get full statedump. > > On ??????, 21 ????? 2016 ?. 14:54:47 EET Raghavendra G wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < >> >> pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote: >> > On 01/18/2016 02:28 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: >> >> XFS. Server side works OK, I'm able to mount volume again. Brick is 30% >> >> full. >> > >> > Oleksandr, >> > >> > Will it be possible to get the statedump of the client, bricks >> > >> > output next time it happens? >> > >> > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/master/doc/debugging/statedump.m >> > d#how-to-generate-statedump >> We also need to dump inode information. To do that you've to add "all=yes" >> to /var/run/gluster/glusterdump.options before you issue commands to get >> statedump. >> >> > Pranith >> > >> >> On ?????????, 18 ????? 2016 ?. 15:07:18 EET baul jianguo wrote: >> >>> What is your brick file system? and the glusterfsd process and all >> >>> thread status? >> >>> I met same issue when client app such as rsync stay in D status,and >> >>> the brick process and relate thread also be in the D status. >> >>> And the brick dev disk util is 100% . >> >>> >> >>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Oleksandr Natalenko >> >>> >> >>> <oleksandr at natalenko.name> wrote: >> >>>> Wrong assumption, rsync hung again. >> >>>> >> >>>> On ??????, 16 ????? 2016 ?. 22:53:04 EET Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: >> >>>>> One possible reason: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> cluster.lookup-optimize: on >> >>>>> cluster.readdir-optimize: on >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I've disabled both optimizations, and at least as of now rsync still >> >>>>> does >> >>>>> its job with no issues. I would like to find out what option causes >> >>>>> such >> >>>>> a >> >>>>> behavior and why. Will test more. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On ????????, 15 ????? 2016 ?. 16:09:51 EET Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: >> >>>>>> Another observation: if rsyncing is resumed after hang, rsync itself >> >>>>>> hangs a lot faster because it does stat of already copied files. So, >> >>>>>> the >> >>>>>> reason may be not writing itself, but massive stat on GlusterFS >> >>>>>> volume >> >>>>>> as well. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> 15.01.2016 09:40, Oleksandr Natalenko ???????: >> >>>>>>> While doing rsync over millions of files from ordinary partition to >> >>>>>>> GlusterFS volume, just after approx. first 2 million rsync hang >> >>>>>>> happens, and the following info appears in dmesg: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> ==>> >>>>>>> [17075038.924481] INFO: task rsync:10310 blocked for more than 120 >> >>>>>>> seconds. >> >>>>>>> [17075038.931948] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" >> >>>>>>> disables this message. >> >>>>>>> [17075038.940748] rsync D ffff88207fc13680 0 10310 >> >>>>>>> 10309 0x00000080 >> >>>>>>> [17075038.940752] ffff8809c578be18 0000000000000086 >> >>>>>>> ffff8809c578bfd8 >> >>>>>>> 0000000000013680 >> >>>>>>> [17075038.940756] ffff8809c578bfd8 0000000000013680 >> >>>>>>> ffff880310cbe660 >> >>>>>>> ffff881159d16a30 >> >>>>>>> [17075038.940759] ffff881e3aa25800 ffff8809c578be48 >> >>>>>>> ffff881159d16b10 >> >>>>>>> ffff88087d553980 >> >>>>>>> [17075038.940762] Call Trace: >> >>>>>>> [17075038.940770] [<ffffffff8160a1d9>] schedule+0x29/0x70 >> >>>>>>> [17075038.940797] [<ffffffffa023a53d>] >> >>>>>>> __fuse_request_send+0x13d/0x2c0 >> >>>>>>> [fuse] >> >>>>>>> [17075038.940801] [<ffffffffa023db30>] ? >> >>>>>>> fuse_get_req_nofail_nopages+0xc0/0x1e0 [fuse] >> >>>>>>> [17075038.940805] [<ffffffff81098350>] ? wake_up_bit+0x30/0x30 >> >>>>>>> [17075038.940809] [<ffffffffa023a6d2>] fuse_request_send+0x12/0x20 >> >>>>>>> [fuse] >> >>>>>>> [17075038.940813] [<ffffffffa024382f>] fuse_flush+0xff/0x150 [fuse] >> >>>>>>> [17075038.940817] [<ffffffff811c45c4>] filp_close+0x34/0x80 >> >>>>>>> [17075038.940821] [<ffffffff811e4ed8>] __close_fd+0x78/0xa0 >> >>>>>>> [17075038.940824] [<ffffffff811c6103>] SyS_close+0x23/0x50 >> >>>>>>> [17075038.940828] [<ffffffff81614de9>] >> >>>>>>> system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b >> >>>>>>> ==>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> rsync blocks in D state, and to kill it, I have to do umount --lazy >> >>>>>>> on >> >>>>>>> GlusterFS mountpoint, and then kill corresponding client glusterfs >> >>>>>>> process. Then rsync exits. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Here is GlusterFS volume info: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> ==>> >>>>>>> Volume Name: asterisk_records >> >>>>>>> Type: Distributed-Replicate >> >>>>>>> Volume ID: dc1fe561-fa3a-4f2e-8330-ec7e52c75ba4 >> >>>>>>> Status: Started >> >>>>>>> Number of Bricks: 3 x 2 = 6 >> >>>>>>> Transport-type: tcp >> >>>>>>> Bricks: >> >>>>>>> Brick1: >> >>>>>>> server1:/bricks/10_megaraid_0_3_9_x_0_4_3_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage_0 >> >>>>>>> 1 >> >>>>>>> /as >> >>>>>>> te >> >>>>>>> risk/records Brick2: >> >>>>>>> server2:/bricks/10_megaraid_8_5_14_x_8_6_16_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage >> >>>>>>> _ >> >>>>>>> 01/ >> >>>>>>> as >> >>>>>>> terisk/records Brick3: >> >>>>>>> server1:/bricks/11_megaraid_0_5_4_x_0_6_5_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage_0 >> >>>>>>> 2 >> >>>>>>> /as >> >>>>>>> te >> >>>>>>> risk/records Brick4: >> >>>>>>> server2:/bricks/11_megaraid_8_7_15_x_8_8_20_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage >> >>>>>>> _ >> >>>>>>> 02/ >> >>>>>>> as >> >>>>>>> terisk/records Brick5: >> >>>>>>> server1:/bricks/12_megaraid_0_7_6_x_0_13_14_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage >> >>>>>>> _ >> >>>>>>> 03/ >> >>>>>>> as >> >>>>>>> terisk/records Brick6: >> >>>>>>> server2:/bricks/12_megaraid_8_9_19_x_8_13_24_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storag >> >>>>>>> e >> >>>>>>> _03 >> >>>>>>> /a >> >>>>>>> sterisk/records Options Reconfigured: >> >>>>>>> cluster.lookup-optimize: on >> >>>>>>> cluster.readdir-optimize: on >> >>>>>>> client.event-threads: 2 >> >>>>>>> network.inode-lru-limit: 4096 >> >>>>>>> server.event-threads: 4 >> >>>>>>> performance.client-io-threads: on >> >>>>>>> storage.linux-aio: on >> >>>>>>> performance.write-behind-window-size: 4194304 >> >>>>>>> performance.stat-prefetch: on >> >>>>>>> performance.quick-read: on >> >>>>>>> performance.read-ahead: on >> >>>>>>> performance.flush-behind: on >> >>>>>>> performance.write-behind: on >> >>>>>>> performance.io-thread-count: 2 >> >>>>>>> performance.cache-max-file-size: 1048576 >> >>>>>>> performance.cache-size: 33554432 >> >>>>>>> features.cache-invalidation: on >> >>>>>>> performance.readdir-ahead: on >> >>>>>>> ==>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> The issue reproduces each time I rsync such an amount of files. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> How could I debug this issue better? >> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list >> >>>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org >> >>>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list >> >>>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org >> >>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> >>>>> >> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list >> >>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org >> >>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> >>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> Gluster-devel mailing list >> >>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org >> >>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Gluster-users mailing list >> >> Gluster-users at gluster.org >> >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Gluster-devel mailing list >> > Gluster-devel at gluster.org >> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > >
baul jianguo
2016-Jan-25  08:02 UTC
[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS FUSE client hangs on rsyncing lots of file
the client statedump is at http://pastebin.centos.org/38671/ On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:33 PM, baul jianguo <roidinev at gmail.com> wrote:> 3.5.7 also hangs.only the flush op hung. Yes,off the > performance.client-io-threads ,no hang. > > The hang does not relate the client kernel version. > > One client statdump about flush op,any abnormal? > > [global.callpool.stack.12] > > uid=0 > > gid=0 > > pid=14432 > > unique=16336007098 > > lk-owner=77cb199aa36f3641 > > op=FLUSH > > type=1 > > cnt=6 > > > > [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.1] > > ref_count=1 > > translator=fuse > > complete=0 > > > > [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.2] > > ref_count=0 > > translator=datavolume-write-behind > > complete=0 > > parent=datavolume-read-ahead > > wind_from=ra_flush > > wind_to=FIRST_CHILD (this)->fops->flush > > unwind_to=ra_flush_cbk > > > > [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.3] > > ref_count=1 > > translator=datavolume-read-ahead > > complete=0 > > parent=datavolume-open-behind > > wind_from=default_flush_resume > > wind_to=FIRST_CHILD(this)->fops->flush > > unwind_to=default_flush_cbk > > > > [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.4] > > ref_count=1 > > translator=datavolume-open-behind > > complete=0 > > parent=datavolume-io-threads > > wind_from=iot_flush_wrapper > > wind_to=FIRST_CHILD(this)->fops->flush > > unwind_to=iot_flush_cbk > > > > [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.5] > > ref_count=1 > > translator=datavolume-io-threads > > complete=0 > > parent=datavolume > > wind_from=io_stats_flush > > wind_to=FIRST_CHILD(this)->fops->flush > > unwind_to=io_stats_flush_cbk > > > > [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.6] > > ref_count=1 > > translator=datavolume > > complete=0 > > parent=fuse > > wind_from=fuse_flush_resume > > wind_to=xl->fops->flush > > unwind_to=fuse_err_cbk > > > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Oleksandr Natalenko > <oleksandr at natalenko.name> wrote: >> With "performance.client-io-threads" set to "off" no hangs occurred in 3 >> rsync/rm rounds. Could that be some fuse-bridge lock race? Will bring that >> option to "on" back again and try to get full statedump. >> >> On ??????, 21 ????? 2016 ?. 14:54:47 EET Raghavendra G wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < >>> >>> pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote: >>> > On 01/18/2016 02:28 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: >>> >> XFS. Server side works OK, I'm able to mount volume again. Brick is 30% >>> >> full. >>> > >>> > Oleksandr, >>> > >>> > Will it be possible to get the statedump of the client, bricks >>> > >>> > output next time it happens? >>> > >>> > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/master/doc/debugging/statedump.m >>> > d#how-to-generate-statedump >>> We also need to dump inode information. To do that you've to add "all=yes" >>> to /var/run/gluster/glusterdump.options before you issue commands to get >>> statedump. >>> >>> > Pranith >>> > >>> >> On ?????????, 18 ????? 2016 ?. 15:07:18 EET baul jianguo wrote: >>> >>> What is your brick file system? and the glusterfsd process and all >>> >>> thread status? >>> >>> I met same issue when client app such as rsync stay in D status,and >>> >>> the brick process and relate thread also be in the D status. >>> >>> And the brick dev disk util is 100% . >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Oleksandr Natalenko >>> >>> >>> >>> <oleksandr at natalenko.name> wrote: >>> >>>> Wrong assumption, rsync hung again. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On ??????, 16 ????? 2016 ?. 22:53:04 EET Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: >>> >>>>> One possible reason: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> cluster.lookup-optimize: on >>> >>>>> cluster.readdir-optimize: on >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I've disabled both optimizations, and at least as of now rsync still >>> >>>>> does >>> >>>>> its job with no issues. I would like to find out what option causes >>> >>>>> such >>> >>>>> a >>> >>>>> behavior and why. Will test more. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On ????????, 15 ????? 2016 ?. 16:09:51 EET Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: >>> >>>>>> Another observation: if rsyncing is resumed after hang, rsync itself >>> >>>>>> hangs a lot faster because it does stat of already copied files. So, >>> >>>>>> the >>> >>>>>> reason may be not writing itself, but massive stat on GlusterFS >>> >>>>>> volume >>> >>>>>> as well. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> 15.01.2016 09:40, Oleksandr Natalenko ???????: >>> >>>>>>> While doing rsync over millions of files from ordinary partition to >>> >>>>>>> GlusterFS volume, just after approx. first 2 million rsync hang >>> >>>>>>> happens, and the following info appears in dmesg: >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> ==>>> >>>>>>> [17075038.924481] INFO: task rsync:10310 blocked for more than 120 >>> >>>>>>> seconds. >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.931948] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" >>> >>>>>>> disables this message. >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940748] rsync D ffff88207fc13680 0 10310 >>> >>>>>>> 10309 0x00000080 >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940752] ffff8809c578be18 0000000000000086 >>> >>>>>>> ffff8809c578bfd8 >>> >>>>>>> 0000000000013680 >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940756] ffff8809c578bfd8 0000000000013680 >>> >>>>>>> ffff880310cbe660 >>> >>>>>>> ffff881159d16a30 >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940759] ffff881e3aa25800 ffff8809c578be48 >>> >>>>>>> ffff881159d16b10 >>> >>>>>>> ffff88087d553980 >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940762] Call Trace: >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940770] [<ffffffff8160a1d9>] schedule+0x29/0x70 >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940797] [<ffffffffa023a53d>] >>> >>>>>>> __fuse_request_send+0x13d/0x2c0 >>> >>>>>>> [fuse] >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940801] [<ffffffffa023db30>] ? >>> >>>>>>> fuse_get_req_nofail_nopages+0xc0/0x1e0 [fuse] >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940805] [<ffffffff81098350>] ? wake_up_bit+0x30/0x30 >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940809] [<ffffffffa023a6d2>] fuse_request_send+0x12/0x20 >>> >>>>>>> [fuse] >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940813] [<ffffffffa024382f>] fuse_flush+0xff/0x150 [fuse] >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940817] [<ffffffff811c45c4>] filp_close+0x34/0x80 >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940821] [<ffffffff811e4ed8>] __close_fd+0x78/0xa0 >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940824] [<ffffffff811c6103>] SyS_close+0x23/0x50 >>> >>>>>>> [17075038.940828] [<ffffffff81614de9>] >>> >>>>>>> system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b >>> >>>>>>> ==>>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> rsync blocks in D state, and to kill it, I have to do umount --lazy >>> >>>>>>> on >>> >>>>>>> GlusterFS mountpoint, and then kill corresponding client glusterfs >>> >>>>>>> process. Then rsync exits. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Here is GlusterFS volume info: >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> ==>>> >>>>>>> Volume Name: asterisk_records >>> >>>>>>> Type: Distributed-Replicate >>> >>>>>>> Volume ID: dc1fe561-fa3a-4f2e-8330-ec7e52c75ba4 >>> >>>>>>> Status: Started >>> >>>>>>> Number of Bricks: 3 x 2 = 6 >>> >>>>>>> Transport-type: tcp >>> >>>>>>> Bricks: >>> >>>>>>> Brick1: >>> >>>>>>> server1:/bricks/10_megaraid_0_3_9_x_0_4_3_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage_0 >>> >>>>>>> 1 >>> >>>>>>> /as >>> >>>>>>> te >>> >>>>>>> risk/records Brick2: >>> >>>>>>> server2:/bricks/10_megaraid_8_5_14_x_8_6_16_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage >>> >>>>>>> _ >>> >>>>>>> 01/ >>> >>>>>>> as >>> >>>>>>> terisk/records Brick3: >>> >>>>>>> server1:/bricks/11_megaraid_0_5_4_x_0_6_5_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage_0 >>> >>>>>>> 2 >>> >>>>>>> /as >>> >>>>>>> te >>> >>>>>>> risk/records Brick4: >>> >>>>>>> server2:/bricks/11_megaraid_8_7_15_x_8_8_20_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage >>> >>>>>>> _ >>> >>>>>>> 02/ >>> >>>>>>> as >>> >>>>>>> terisk/records Brick5: >>> >>>>>>> server1:/bricks/12_megaraid_0_7_6_x_0_13_14_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage >>> >>>>>>> _ >>> >>>>>>> 03/ >>> >>>>>>> as >>> >>>>>>> terisk/records Brick6: >>> >>>>>>> server2:/bricks/12_megaraid_8_9_19_x_8_13_24_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storag >>> >>>>>>> e >>> >>>>>>> _03 >>> >>>>>>> /a >>> >>>>>>> sterisk/records Options Reconfigured: >>> >>>>>>> cluster.lookup-optimize: on >>> >>>>>>> cluster.readdir-optimize: on >>> >>>>>>> client.event-threads: 2 >>> >>>>>>> network.inode-lru-limit: 4096 >>> >>>>>>> server.event-threads: 4 >>> >>>>>>> performance.client-io-threads: on >>> >>>>>>> storage.linux-aio: on >>> >>>>>>> performance.write-behind-window-size: 4194304 >>> >>>>>>> performance.stat-prefetch: on >>> >>>>>>> performance.quick-read: on >>> >>>>>>> performance.read-ahead: on >>> >>>>>>> performance.flush-behind: on >>> >>>>>>> performance.write-behind: on >>> >>>>>>> performance.io-thread-count: 2 >>> >>>>>>> performance.cache-max-file-size: 1048576 >>> >>>>>>> performance.cache-size: 33554432 >>> >>>>>>> features.cache-invalidation: on >>> >>>>>>> performance.readdir-ahead: on >>> >>>>>>> ==>>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> The issue reproduces each time I rsync such an amount of files. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> How could I debug this issue better? >>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list >>> >>>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org >>> >>>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> >>>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org >>> >>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> >>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org >>> >>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >>>> >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> >>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org >>> >>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Gluster-users mailing list >>> >> Gluster-users at gluster.org >>> >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Gluster-devel mailing list >>> > Gluster-devel at gluster.org >>> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> >>
Pranith Kumar Karampuri
2016-Jan-27  08:35 UTC
[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS FUSE client hangs on rsyncing lots of file
Hi,
       If the hang appears on enabling client side io-threads then it 
could be because of some race that is seen when io-threads is enabled on 
the client side. 2 things will help us debug this issue:
1) thread apply all bt inside gdb (with debuginfo rpms/debs installed )
2) Complete statedump of the mount at two intervals preferably 10 
seconds apart. It becomes difficult to find out which ones are stuck vs 
the ones that are on-going when we have just one statedump. If we have 
two, we can find which frames are common in both of the statedumps and 
then take a closer look there.
Feel free to ping me on #gluster-dev, nick: pranithk if you have the 
process hung in that state and you guys don't mind me do a live 
debugging with you guys. This option is the best of the lot!
Thanks a lot baul, Oleksandr for the debugging so far!
Pranith
On 01/25/2016 01:03 PM, baul jianguo wrote:> 3.5.7 also hangs.only the flush op hung. Yes,off the
> performance.client-io-threads ,no hang.
>
> The hang does not relate the client kernel version.
>
> One client statdump about flush op,any abnormal?
>
> [global.callpool.stack.12]
>
> uid=0
>
> gid=0
>
> pid=14432
>
> unique=16336007098
>
> lk-owner=77cb199aa36f3641
>
> op=FLUSH
>
> type=1
>
> cnt=6
>
>
>
> [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.1]
>
> ref_count=1
>
> translator=fuse
>
> complete=0
>
>
>
> [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.2]
>
> ref_count=0
>
> translator=datavolume-write-behind
>
> complete=0
>
> parent=datavolume-read-ahead
>
> wind_from=ra_flush
>
> wind_to=FIRST_CHILD (this)->fops->flush
>
> unwind_to=ra_flush_cbk
>
>
>
> [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.3]
>
> ref_count=1
>
> translator=datavolume-read-ahead
>
> complete=0
>
> parent=datavolume-open-behind
>
> wind_from=default_flush_resume
>
> wind_to=FIRST_CHILD(this)->fops->flush
>
> unwind_to=default_flush_cbk
>
>
>
> [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.4]
>
> ref_count=1
>
> translator=datavolume-open-behind
>
> complete=0
>
> parent=datavolume-io-threads
>
> wind_from=iot_flush_wrapper
>
> wind_to=FIRST_CHILD(this)->fops->flush
>
> unwind_to=iot_flush_cbk
>
>
>
> [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.5]
>
> ref_count=1
>
> translator=datavolume-io-threads
>
> complete=0
>
> parent=datavolume
>
> wind_from=io_stats_flush
>
> wind_to=FIRST_CHILD(this)->fops->flush
>
> unwind_to=io_stats_flush_cbk
>
>
>
> [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.6]
>
> ref_count=1
>
> translator=datavolume
>
> complete=0
>
> parent=fuse
>
> wind_from=fuse_flush_resume
>
> wind_to=xl->fops->flush
>
> unwind_to=fuse_err_cbk
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Oleksandr Natalenko
> <oleksandr at natalenko.name> wrote:
>> With "performance.client-io-threads" set to "off"
no hangs occurred in 3
>> rsync/rm rounds. Could that be some fuse-bridge lock race? Will bring
that
>> option to "on" back again and try to get full statedump.
>>
>> On ??????, 21 ????? 2016 ?. 14:54:47 EET Raghavendra G wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
>>>
>>> pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On 01/18/2016 02:28 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
>>>>> XFS. Server side works OK, I'm able to mount volume
again. Brick is 30%
>>>>> full.
>>>> Oleksandr,
>>>>
>>>>        Will it be possible to get the statedump of the client,
bricks
>>>>
>>>> output next time it happens?
>>>>
>>>>
https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/master/doc/debugging/statedump.m
>>>> d#how-to-generate-statedump
>>> We also need to dump inode information. To do that you've to
add "all=yes"
>>> to /var/run/gluster/glusterdump.options before you issue commands
to get
>>> statedump.
>>>
>>>> Pranith
>>>>
>>>>> On ?????????, 18 ????? 2016 ?. 15:07:18 EET baul jianguo
wrote:
>>>>>> What is your brick file system? and the glusterfsd
process and all
>>>>>> thread status?
>>>>>> I met same issue when client app such as rsync stay in
D status,and
>>>>>> the brick process and relate thread also be in the D
status.
>>>>>> And the brick dev disk util is 100% .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Oleksandr Natalenko
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <oleksandr at natalenko.name> wrote:
>>>>>>> Wrong assumption, rsync hung again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On ??????, 16 ????? 2016 ?. 22:53:04 EET Oleksandr
Natalenko wrote:
>>>>>>>> One possible reason:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cluster.lookup-optimize: on
>>>>>>>> cluster.readdir-optimize: on
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've disabled both optimizations, and at
least as of now rsync still
>>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>> its job with no issues. I would like to find
out what option causes
>>>>>>>> such
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> behavior and why. Will test more.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On ????????, 15 ????? 2016 ?. 16:09:51 EET
Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Another observation: if rsyncing is resumed
after hang, rsync itself
>>>>>>>>> hangs a lot faster because it does stat of
already copied files. So,
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> reason may be not writing itself, but
massive stat on GlusterFS
>>>>>>>>> volume
>>>>>>>>> as well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 15.01.2016 09:40, Oleksandr Natalenko
???????:
>>>>>>>>>> While doing rsync over millions of
files from ordinary partition to
>>>>>>>>>> GlusterFS volume, just after approx.
first 2 million rsync hang
>>>>>>>>>> happens, and the following info appears
in dmesg:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
==>>>>>>>>>> [17075038.924481] INFO: task
rsync:10310 blocked for more than 120
>>>>>>>>>> seconds.
>>>>>>>>>> [17075038.931948] "echo 0 >
/proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
>>>>>>>>>> disables this message.
>>>>>>>>>> [17075038.940748] rsync           D
ffff88207fc13680     0 10310
>>>>>>>>>> 10309 0x00000080
>>>>>>>>>> [17075038.940752]  ffff8809c578be18
0000000000000086
>>>>>>>>>> ffff8809c578bfd8
>>>>>>>>>> 0000000000013680
>>>>>>>>>> [17075038.940756]  ffff8809c578bfd8
0000000000013680
>>>>>>>>>> ffff880310cbe660
>>>>>>>>>> ffff881159d16a30
>>>>>>>>>> [17075038.940759]  ffff881e3aa25800
ffff8809c578be48
>>>>>>>>>> ffff881159d16b10
>>>>>>>>>> ffff88087d553980
>>>>>>>>>> [17075038.940762] Call Trace:
>>>>>>>>>> [17075038.940770] 
[<ffffffff8160a1d9>] schedule+0x29/0x70
>>>>>>>>>> [17075038.940797] 
[<ffffffffa023a53d>]
>>>>>>>>>> __fuse_request_send+0x13d/0x2c0
>>>>>>>>>> [fuse]
>>>>>>>>>> [17075038.940801] 
[<ffffffffa023db30>] ?
>>>>>>>>>> fuse_get_req_nofail_nopages+0xc0/0x1e0
[fuse]
>>>>>>>>>> [17075038.940805] 
[<ffffffff81098350>] ? wake_up_bit+0x30/0x30
>>>>>>>>>> [17075038.940809] 
[<ffffffffa023a6d2>] fuse_request_send+0x12/0x20
>>>>>>>>>> [fuse]
>>>>>>>>>> [17075038.940813] 
[<ffffffffa024382f>] fuse_flush+0xff/0x150 [fuse]
>>>>>>>>>> [17075038.940817] 
[<ffffffff811c45c4>] filp_close+0x34/0x80
>>>>>>>>>> [17075038.940821] 
[<ffffffff811e4ed8>] __close_fd+0x78/0xa0
>>>>>>>>>> [17075038.940824] 
[<ffffffff811c6103>] SyS_close+0x23/0x50
>>>>>>>>>> [17075038.940828] 
[<ffffffff81614de9>]
>>>>>>>>>> system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>>>>>>>>>>
==>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> rsync blocks in D state, and to kill
it, I have to do umount --lazy
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> GlusterFS mountpoint, and then kill
corresponding client glusterfs
>>>>>>>>>> process. Then rsync exits.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here is GlusterFS volume info:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
==>>>>>>>>>> Volume Name: asterisk_records
>>>>>>>>>> Type: Distributed-Replicate
>>>>>>>>>> Volume ID:
dc1fe561-fa3a-4f2e-8330-ec7e52c75ba4
>>>>>>>>>> Status: Started
>>>>>>>>>> Number of Bricks: 3 x 2 = 6
>>>>>>>>>> Transport-type: tcp
>>>>>>>>>> Bricks:
>>>>>>>>>> Brick1:
>>>>>>>>>>
server1:/bricks/10_megaraid_0_3_9_x_0_4_3_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage_0
>>>>>>>>>> 1
>>>>>>>>>> /as
>>>>>>>>>> te
>>>>>>>>>> risk/records Brick2:
>>>>>>>>>>
server2:/bricks/10_megaraid_8_5_14_x_8_6_16_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage
>>>>>>>>>> _
>>>>>>>>>> 01/
>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>> terisk/records Brick3:
>>>>>>>>>>
server1:/bricks/11_megaraid_0_5_4_x_0_6_5_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage_0
>>>>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>>>> /as
>>>>>>>>>> te
>>>>>>>>>> risk/records Brick4:
>>>>>>>>>>
server2:/bricks/11_megaraid_8_7_15_x_8_8_20_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage
>>>>>>>>>> _
>>>>>>>>>> 02/
>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>> terisk/records Brick5:
>>>>>>>>>>
server1:/bricks/12_megaraid_0_7_6_x_0_13_14_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage
>>>>>>>>>> _
>>>>>>>>>> 03/
>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>> terisk/records Brick6:
>>>>>>>>>>
server2:/bricks/12_megaraid_8_9_19_x_8_13_24_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storag
>>>>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>>>>> _03
>>>>>>>>>> /a
>>>>>>>>>> sterisk/records Options Reconfigured:
>>>>>>>>>> cluster.lookup-optimize: on
>>>>>>>>>> cluster.readdir-optimize: on
>>>>>>>>>> client.event-threads: 2
>>>>>>>>>> network.inode-lru-limit: 4096
>>>>>>>>>> server.event-threads: 4
>>>>>>>>>> performance.client-io-threads: on
>>>>>>>>>> storage.linux-aio: on
>>>>>>>>>> performance.write-behind-window-size:
4194304
>>>>>>>>>> performance.stat-prefetch: on
>>>>>>>>>> performance.quick-read: on
>>>>>>>>>> performance.read-ahead: on
>>>>>>>>>> performance.flush-behind: on
>>>>>>>>>> performance.write-behind: on
>>>>>>>>>> performance.io-thread-count: 2
>>>>>>>>>> performance.cache-max-file-size:
1048576
>>>>>>>>>> performance.cache-size: 33554432
>>>>>>>>>> features.cache-invalidation: on
>>>>>>>>>> performance.readdir-ahead: on
>>>>>>>>>>
==>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The issue reproduces each time I rsync
such an amount of files.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How could I debug this issue better?
>>>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>>>>>>>
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>>>>>>>
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>>>>>>
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>>>>>
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>