----- Original Message -----> From: "Atin Mukherjee" <amukherj at redhat.com> > > > > Wheezy has an old version of liburcu [1]. Gluster requires at-least > > v0.7. I don't know how Wheezy packages even got built without the > > required version of liburcu being present. > Probably Kaleb might be knowing it? > > > > [1] https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=names&keywords=urcu > >Good question. The debian package build runs configure, so the build _should_ have failed. We hadn't built 3.7.x up until 3.7.6 because of other dependencies that were finally resolved in 3.7.6. Will have to investigate why the build did not fail on the incorrect urcu. I'll pull the wheezy bits from d.g.o. Thanks -- Kaleb
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote:> > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Atin Mukherjee" <amukherj at redhat.com> >> > >> > Wheezy has an old version of liburcu [1]. Gluster requires at-least >> > v0.7. I don't know how Wheezy packages even got built without the >> > required version of liburcu being present. >> Probably Kaleb might be knowing it? >> > >> > [1] https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=names&keywords=urcu >> > > > Good question. The debian package build runs configure, so the build _should_ have failed. > > We hadn't built 3.7.x up until 3.7.6 because of other dependencies that were finally resolved in 3.7.6. > > Will have to investigate why the build did not fail on the incorrect urcu. > > I'll pull the wheezy bits from d.g.o.I can help analyze if there are any logs available.> > Thanks > > -- > > Kaleb >
Kaleb Keithley wrote on 21/01/2016 11:51:>> From: "Atin Mukherjee" <amukherj at redhat.com> >>> >>> Wheezy has an old version of liburcu [1]. Gluster requires >>> at-least v0.7. I don't know how Wheezy packages even got built >>> without the required version of liburcu being present. >> Probably Kaleb might be knowing it? >>> >>> [1] >>> https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=names&keywords=urcu > > Good question. The debian package build runs configure, so the build > _should_ have failed. > > We hadn't built 3.7.x up until 3.7.6 because of other dependencies > that were finally resolved in 3.7.6. > > Will have to investigate why the build did not fail on the incorrect > urcu. > > I'll pull the wheezy bits from d.g.o.Hi Kaleb, Is there a chance that the builds could be fixed to work with Wheezy? Thanks all for your quick responses. Ronny -- Ronny Adsetts Technical Director Amazing Internet Ltd, London t: +44 20 8977 8943 w: www.amazinginternet.com Registered office: 85 Waldegrave Park, Twickenham, TW1 4TJ Registered in England. Company No. 4042957 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 196 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160121/e397916f/attachment.sig>