From: Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 4:44 PM
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 06:49:26PM +0000, Ted Miller
wrote:>
> ________________________________
> From: Humble Devassy Chirammal <humble.devassy at gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 9:37 AM
> Hi All,
>
> GlusterFS 3.7.0 RPMs for RHEL, CentOS, Fedora and packages for Debian are
available at download.gluster.org<http://download.gluster.org> [1].
>
> [1] http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.7/3.7.0/
>
> --Humble
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at
redhat.com<mailto:vbellur at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am happy to announce that Gluster 3.7.0 is now generally available. 3.7.0
contains several
>
> [snip]
>
> Cheers,
> Vijay
>
> [snip]
>
> What happened to packages for RHEL/Centos 5? I have the (probably
> unusual--added gluster to existing servers) setup of running a replica
> 3 cluster where two nodes run on Centos 6 and one is still on Centos
> 5. This is a personal setup, and I have been using
>
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/EPEL.repo/epel-5/x86_64/repodata/repomod.xml
> as my repo. It has worked fine for a while, but this time the two
> Centos 6 nodes updated to 3.7, but the Centos 5 node got left behind
> at 3.6.3.
Packages for RHEL/CentOS-5 are not available yet. These will follow
later. Thare are some changes needed to be able to build the packages on
EL5. Because we are currently stabilizing our CI/regression tests, we do
not merge any other changes. Until we provide packages in our
repository, you could apply patch http://review.gluster.org/10803
yourself and build the EL5 version. I expect that we will do a release
in 2-3 weeks which will have EL5 RPMs too.
I have no idea about the problem below, it sounds like something the
GlusterD developers could help with.
Niels
> Command 'gluster volume status' on the C5 machine makes everything
> look fine:
>
> Status of volume: ISO2
> Gluster process Port Online Pid
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Brick 10.x.x.2:/bricks/01/iso2 49162 Y 4679
> Brick 10.x.x.4:/bricks/01/iso2 49183 Y 6447
> Brick 10.x.x.9:/bricks/01/iso2 49169 Y 1985
>
> But the same command on either of the C6 machines shows the C5 machine
> (10.x.x.2) missing in action (though it does recognize that there are
> NFS and heal daemons there):
>
> Status of volume: ISO2
> Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online
Pid
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Brick 10.41.65.4:/bricks/01/iso2 49183 0 Y
6447
> Brick 10.41.65.9:/bricks/01/iso2 49169 0 Y
1985
> NFS Server on localhost 2049 0 Y
2279
> Self-heal Daemon on localhost N/A N/A Y
2754
> NFS Server on 10.41.65.2 2049 0 Y
4757
> Self-heal Daemon on 10.41.65.2 N/A N/A Y
4764
> NFS Server on 10.41.65.4 2049 0 Y
6543
> Self-heal Daemon on 10.41.65.4 N/A N/A Y
6551
>
> So, is this just an oversight (I hope), or has support for C5 been dropped?
> If support for C5 is gone, how do I downgrade my Centos6 machines back
> to 3.6.x? (I know how to change the repo, but the actual sequence of
> yum commands and gluster commands is unknown to me).
>
> Ted Miller
> Elkhart, IN, USA
Thanks for the information. As long as I know it is coming, I can improvise and
hang on.
I am assuming that the problem with the .2 machine not being seen is a result of
running a cluster with a version split.
Ted Miller