Li RongQing
2019-Feb-22 08:51 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH][nf-next] netfilter: convert the proto argument from u8 to u16
The proto in struct xt_match and struct xt_target is u16, when calling xt_check_target/match, their proto argument is u8, and will cause truncation, it is harmless to ip packet, since ip proto is u8 if a L2 match/target has proto that is u16, will cause the check failure. and convert be16 to short in bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c Signed-off-by: Zhang Yu <zhangyu31 at baidu.com> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing at baidu.com> --- include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h | 4 ++-- net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c | 6 +++--- net/netfilter/x_tables.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h b/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h index 9077b3ebea08..8ba6a6227542 100644 --- a/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h +++ b/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h @@ -289,9 +289,9 @@ bool xt_find_jump_offset(const unsigned int *offsets, int xt_check_proc_name(const char *name, unsigned int size); -int xt_check_match(struct xt_mtchk_param *, unsigned int size, u_int8_t proto, +int xt_check_match(struct xt_mtchk_param *, unsigned int size, u_int16_t proto, bool inv_proto); -int xt_check_target(struct xt_tgchk_param *, unsigned int size, u_int8_t proto, +int xt_check_target(struct xt_tgchk_param *, unsigned int size, u_int16_t proto, bool inv_proto); int xt_match_to_user(const struct xt_entry_match *m, diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c index 6693e209efe8..7bbb9b189752 100644 --- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c +++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ ebt_check_match(struct ebt_entry_match *m, struct xt_mtchk_param *par, par->match = match; par->matchinfo = m->data; ret = xt_check_match(par, m->match_size, - e->ethproto, e->invflags & EBT_IPROTO); + ntohs(e->ethproto), e->invflags & EBT_IPROTO); if (ret < 0) { module_put(match->me); return ret; @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ ebt_check_watcher(struct ebt_entry_watcher *w, struct xt_tgchk_param *par, par->target = watcher; par->targinfo = w->data; ret = xt_check_target(par, w->watcher_size, - e->ethproto, e->invflags & EBT_IPROTO); + ntohs(e->ethproto), e->invflags & EBT_IPROTO); if (ret < 0) { module_put(watcher->me); return ret; @@ -767,7 +767,7 @@ ebt_check_entry(struct ebt_entry *e, struct net *net, tgpar.target = target; tgpar.targinfo = t->data; ret = xt_check_target(&tgpar, t->target_size, - e->ethproto, e->invflags & EBT_IPROTO); + ntohs(e->ethproto), e->invflags & EBT_IPROTO); if (ret < 0) { module_put(target->me); goto cleanup_watchers; diff --git a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c index 13e1ac333fa4..5b61146443ad 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c +++ b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ int xt_check_proc_name(const char *name, unsigned int size) EXPORT_SYMBOL(xt_check_proc_name); int xt_check_match(struct xt_mtchk_param *par, - unsigned int size, u_int8_t proto, bool inv_proto) + unsigned int size, u_int16_t proto, bool inv_proto) { int ret; @@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ bool xt_find_jump_offset(const unsigned int *offsets, EXPORT_SYMBOL(xt_find_jump_offset); int xt_check_target(struct xt_tgchk_param *par, - unsigned int size, u_int8_t proto, bool inv_proto) + unsigned int size, u_int16_t proto, bool inv_proto) { int ret; -- 2.16.2
Florian Westphal
2019-Feb-22 11:52 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH][nf-next] netfilter: convert the proto argument from u8 to u16
Li RongQing <lirongqing at baidu.com> wrote:> The proto in struct xt_match and struct xt_target is u16, when > calling xt_check_target/match, their proto argument is u8, > and will cause truncation, it is harmless to ip packet, since > ip proto is u8 > > if a L2 match/target has proto that is u16, will cause the check > failure.Yes, I don't see any ebtables matches/targets that set .proto though, so no failure should happen in current kernel. Otherwise, could you add an example where we hit a checkentry failure in error?> +int xt_check_match(struct xt_mtchk_param *, unsigned int size, u_int16_t proto, > bool inv_proto);I think you can use u16 instead of the old u_int16_t. Other than that, this looks good to me, thanks.