Vivien Didelot
2019-Dec-10 19:39 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: add STP xstats
Hi Nikolay, On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:49:59 +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:> Why did you send the bridge patch again ? Does it have any changes ?The second iproute2 patch does not include the include guards update, but I kept the bridge_stp_stats structure and the BRIDGE_XSTATS_STP definition otherwise iproute2 wouldn't compile.> > Why do you need percpu ? All of these seem to be incremented with the > bridge lock held. A few more comments below.All other xstats are incremented percpu, I simply followed the pattern.> > struct net_bridge_port *p > > = container_of(kobj, struct net_bridge_port, kobj); > > + free_percpu(p->stp_stats); > > Please leave a new line between local var declaration and the code. I know > it was missing, but you can add it now. :)OK.> > + if (p) { > > + struct bridge_stp_xstats xstats; > > Please rename the local var here, using just xstats is misleading. > Maybe stp_xstats ?This isn't misleading to me since its scope is limited to the current block and not the entire function. The block above dumping the VLAN xstats is using a local "struct br_vlan_stats stats" variable for example.> > > + > > + br_stp_get_xstats(p, &xstats); > > + > > + if (nla_put(skb, BRIDGE_XSTATS_STP, sizeof(xstats), &xstats)) > > + goto nla_put_failure; > > Could you please follow how mcast xstats are dumped and do something similar ? > It'd be nice to have similar code to audit.Sure. I would also love to have easily auditable code in net/bridge. For the bridge STP xstats I followed the VLAN xstats code above, which does: if (nla_put(skb, BRIDGE_XSTATS_VLAN, sizeof(vxi), &vxi)) goto nla_put_failure; But I can change the STP xstats code to the following: if (p) { nla = nla_reserve_64bit(skb, BRIDGE_XSTATS_STP, sizeof(struct bridge_stp_xstats), BRIDGE_XSTATS_PAD); if (!nla) goto nla_put_failure; br_stp_get_xstats(p, nla_data(nla)); } Would that be preferred? Thanks, Vivien
Nikolay Aleksandrov
2019-Dec-10 19:50 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: add STP xstats
On 10/12/2019 21:39, Vivien Didelot wrote:> Hi Nikolay, > > On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:49:59 +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: > >> Why did you send the bridge patch again ? Does it have any changes ? > > The second iproute2 patch does not include the include guards update, but > I kept the bridge_stp_stats structure and the BRIDGE_XSTATS_STP definition > otherwise iproute2 wouldn't compile. > >> >> Why do you need percpu ? All of these seem to be incremented with the >> bridge lock held. A few more comments below. > > All other xstats are incremented percpu, I simply followed the pattern. >We have already a lock, we can use it and avoid the whole per-cpu memory handling. It seems to be acquired in all cases where these counters need to be changed.>>> struct net_bridge_port *p >>> = container_of(kobj, struct net_bridge_port, kobj); >>> + free_percpu(p->stp_stats); >> >> Please leave a new line between local var declaration and the code. I know >> it was missing, but you can add it now. :) > > OK. > >>> + if (p) { >>> + struct bridge_stp_xstats xstats; >> >> Please rename the local var here, using just xstats is misleading. >> Maybe stp_xstats ? > > This isn't misleading to me since its scope is limited to the current block > and not the entire function. The block above dumping the VLAN xstats is > using a local "struct br_vlan_stats stats" variable for example. >Yep, as I answered to myself earlier, with the below change this goes away.>> >>> + >>> + br_stp_get_xstats(p, &xstats); >>> + >>> + if (nla_put(skb, BRIDGE_XSTATS_STP, sizeof(xstats), &xstats)) >>> + goto nla_put_failure; >> >> Could you please follow how mcast xstats are dumped and do something similar ? >> It'd be nice to have similar code to audit. > > Sure. I would also love to have easily auditable code in net/bridge. For > the bridge STP xstats I followed the VLAN xstats code above, which does: > > if (nla_put(skb, BRIDGE_XSTATS_VLAN, sizeof(vxi), &vxi)) > goto nla_put_failure; >Yeah, we can move that to a vlan-specific helper too, but that is an unrelated change.> But I can change the STP xstats code to the following: > > if (p) { > nla = nla_reserve_64bit(skb, BRIDGE_XSTATS_STP, > sizeof(struct bridge_stp_xstats), > BRIDGE_XSTATS_PAD); > if (!nla) > goto nla_put_failure; > > br_stp_get_xstats(p, nla_data(nla)); > } > > Would that be preferred? > >Perfect, thanks!> Thanks, > > Vivien >