Linus Lüssing
2017-Mar-15 14:27 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net] bridge: ebtables: fix reception of frames DNAT-ed to bridge device
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:42:11AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:> I'm missing then why redirect is not then just enough for Linus usecase.For my usecase, the MAC address is configured by the user from a Web-UI. It may or may not be the one from the bridge device. Besides, found it counter intuitive that DNAT did not work here and took me some time to find out why. At least I didn't read about any such known limitations of the dnat target in the ebtables manpage.
Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-Mar-15 18:15 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net] bridge: ebtables: fix reception of frames DNAT-ed to bridge device
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:27:20PM +0100, Linus L?ssing wrote:> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:42:11AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > I'm missing then why redirect is not then just enough for Linus usecase. > > For my usecase, the MAC address is configured by the user from a > Web-UI. It may or may not be the one from the bridge device. > > Besides, found it counter intuitive that DNAT did not work here > and took me some time to find out why. At least I didn't read about > any such known limitations of the dnat target in the ebtables > manpage.Could you update ebtables dnat to check if the ethernet address matches the one of the input bridge interface, so we mangle the ->pkt_type accordingly from there, instead of doing this from the core?