Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-May-21 10:42 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next] bridge: skip fdb add if the port shouldn't learn
From: Wilson Kok <wkok at cumulusnetworks.com> Check in fdb_add_entry() if the source port should learn, similar check is used in br_fdb_update. Note that new fdb entries which are added manually or as local ones are still permitted. This patch has been tested by running traffic via a bridge port and switching the port's state, also by manually adding/removing entries from the bridge's fdb. Signed-off-by: Wilson Kok <wkok at cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> --- Nik: Maybe it'd be better if we returned an error even though it doesn't look necessary. I'm open to suggestions. net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c index e0670d7054f9..27de0b7bd76b 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c @@ -736,6 +736,12 @@ static int fdb_add_entry(struct net_bridge_port *source, const __u8 *addr, struct net_bridge_fdb_entry *fdb; bool modified = false; + /* If the port cannot learn allow only local and static entries */ + if (!(state & NUD_PERMANENT) && !(state & NUD_NOARP) && + !(source->state == BR_STATE_LEARNING || + source->state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING)) + return 0; + fdb = fdb_find(head, addr, vid); if (fdb == NULL) { if (!(flags & NLM_F_CREATE)) -- 1.9.3
David Miller
2015-May-25 02:59 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next] bridge: skip fdb add if the port shouldn't learn
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 03:42:57 -0700> From: Wilson Kok <wkok at cumulusnetworks.com> > > Check in fdb_add_entry() if the source port should learn, similar > check is used in br_fdb_update. > Note that new fdb entries which are added manually or > as local ones are still permitted. > This patch has been tested by running traffic via a bridge port and > switching the port's state, also by manually adding/removing entries > from the bridge's fdb. > > Signed-off-by: Wilson Kok <wkok at cumulusnetworks.com> > Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> > --- > Nik: Maybe it'd be better if we returned an error even though it > doesn't look necessary. I'm open to suggestions.If you don't return an error, then rtnetlink.c is going to emit a NEWNEIGH netlink message. I seriously doubt we want that to happen.
Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-May-25 13:39 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next v2] bridge: skip fdb add if the port shouldn't learn
From: Wilson Kok <wkok at cumulusnetworks.com> Check in fdb_add_entry() if the source port should learn, similar check is used in br_fdb_update. Note that new fdb entries which are added manually or as local ones are still permitted. This patch has been tested by running traffic via a bridge port and switching the port's state, also by manually adding/removing entries from the bridge's fdb. Signed-off-by: Wilson Kok <wkok at cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> --- v2: return an error instead of silently failing. net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c index e0670d7054f9..7896cf143045 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c @@ -736,6 +736,12 @@ static int fdb_add_entry(struct net_bridge_port *source, const __u8 *addr, struct net_bridge_fdb_entry *fdb; bool modified = false; + /* If the port cannot learn allow only local and static entries */ + if (!(state & NUD_PERMANENT) && !(state & NUD_NOARP) && + !(source->state == BR_STATE_LEARNING || + source->state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING)) + return -EPERM; + fdb = fdb_find(head, addr, vid); if (fdb == NULL) { if (!(flags & NLM_F_CREATE)) -- 1.7.10.4
Stephen Hemminger
2015-May-26 17:28 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next] bridge: skip fdb add if the port shouldn't learn
On Thu, 21 May 2015 03:42:57 -0700 Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:> From: Wilson Kok <wkok at cumulusnetworks.com> > > Check in fdb_add_entry() if the source port should learn, similar > check is used in br_fdb_update. > Note that new fdb entries which are added manually or > as local ones are still permitted. > This patch has been tested by running traffic via a bridge port and > switching the port's state, also by manually adding/removing entries > from the bridge's fdb. > > Signed-off-by: Wilson Kok <wkok at cumulusnetworks.com> > Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com>What is the problem this is trying to solve? I think user should be allowed to manually add any entry even if learning.