thr3ads.net - Ocfs2 devel - [Ocfs2-devel] kernel bug [Jan 2018]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

BASSAGET Cédric

2018-Jan-11 06:49 UTC

[Ocfs2-devel] kernel bug

Hi Changwei.
My question may be stupid, but... can you tell me where I can find the
source of latest ocfs2 ?
Every google search points to oracle website which refers to 1.6
versions....

2018-01-11 2:03 GMT+01:00 Changwei Ge <ge.changwei at h3c.com>:
> Hi C?dric,
>
> These two patches are already picked by Andrew being merged into -mm tree
> for now.
> So you can refer to below links for them:
>
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ozlabs.org_-7Eakpm_mmots_broken-2Dout_ocfs2-2Dmake-2D&d=DwIFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=X2J0M6NkocsU4wZdP80cyhu00PjVCzf735naCm4yqiU&s=yp0Zw-l3jTCIjTW-RPEqU5cg8sHgSpCZ83sJ2bMsG84&e>
metadata-estimation-accurate-and-clear.patch
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ozlabs.org_-7Eakpm_mmots_broken-2Dout_ocfs2-2Dtry-2Dto-2Dreuse-2D&d=DwIFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=X2J0M6NkocsU4wZdP80cyhu00PjVCzf735naCm4yqiU&s=_-08wf1UDf8iEhLBb3M1o_Q02Qjl6kviphh7RQgo408&e>
extent-block-in-dealloc-without-meta_alloc.patch
>
> Thanks,
> Changwei
>
> On 2018/1/10 22:34, BASSAGET C?dric wrote:
> > Hi Changwei,
> > Can you give me a ref or a link pointing to your patch ?
> > Thanks
> >
> > 2018-01-10 12:57 GMT+01:00 Changwei Ge <ge.changwei at h3c.com
<mailto:
> ge.changwei at h3c.com>>:
> >
> >     Hi BASSAGET,
> >
> >     We ocfs2 developers are solving a DIO crash issue which may share
> the same root cause with yours.
> >
> >     You can refer to my patch set of 2 and backport them into your
> kernel to see if the issue can be kicked away.
> >
> >        ocfs2: make metadata estimation accurate and clear
> >        ocfs2: try to reuse extent block in dealloc without meta_alloc
> >
> >     On 2018/1/10 19:48, BASSAGET C?dric wrote:
> >     > Hello
> >     > Today I reported a bug related to ocfs2 1.8.on proxmox forum,
> maybe somebody here will be able to help me...
> >      > The bog on proxmox forum :
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.proxmox.com_&d=DwIFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=X2J0M6NkocsU4wZdP80cyhu00PjVCzf735naCm4yqiU&s=-6NsvHEvy0Ve3ONNa9Do3_ltNYdYm3UkbH1-dofuYgs&e>
threads/ocfs2-kernel-bug.39163/
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.proxmox.com_&d=DwIFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=X2J0M6NkocsU4wZdP80cyhu00PjVCzf735naCm4yqiU&s=-6NsvHEvy0Ve3ONNa9Do3_ltNYdYm3UkbH1-dofuYgs&e>
threads/ocfs2-kernel-bug.39163/>
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__urldefense&d=DwIFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=X2J0M6NkocsU4wZdP80cyhu00PjVCzf735naCm4yqiU&s=LMeEX9TFZT6vl1YiqduDZZwSb5YFQ8KDSg8K_yyImmI&e=.
> proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.proxmox.com_threads_
>
ocfs2-2Dkernel-2Dbug.39163_&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIr
> MUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iD
> Y8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=93_F2INiG6ig-q6s8P3sPY09iW1NMx6_H9zZx13OxhM&s>
j8Ae2cUQUVQJOimaDZOI0C-HbAhHPvEV-l6BS23AaSw&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__urldefense&d=DwIFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=X2J0M6NkocsU4wZdP80cyhu00PjVCzf735naCm4yqiU&s=LMeEX9TFZT6vl1YiqduDZZwSb5YFQ8KDSg8K_yyImmI&e=.
> proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.proxmox.com_threads_
>
ocfs2-2Dkernel-2Dbug.39163_&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIr
> MUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iD
> Y8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=93_F2INiG6ig-q6s8P3sPY09iW1NMx6_H9zZx13OxhM&s>
j8Ae2cUQUVQJOimaDZOI0C-HbAhHPvEV-l6BS23AaSw&e=>>
> >      >
> >      > to resume : kernel BUG at fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:2017!
> >      >
> >      > is this related to proxmox kernel or ocfs2 ? or both ?
> >      > does it have something to do with https://oss.oracle.com/
> pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2017-January/012701.html <https://oss.oracle.com/
> pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2017-January/012701.html> ?
> >      >
> >      > Thanks for your help.
> >      > Regards,
> >      > C?dric
> >
> >
>
>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/attachments/20180111/24523fd1/attachment.html

Changwei Ge

2018-Jan-11 07:06 UTC

head link

[Ocfs2-devel] kernel bug

Hi C?dric,

On kernel mainline:)

On 2018/1/11 14:50, BASSAGET C?dric wrote:> Hi Changwei.
> My question may be stupid, but... can you tell me where I can find the
source of latest ocfs2 ?
> Every google search points to oracle website which refers to 1.6
versions....
> 
> 2018-01-11 2:03 GMT+01:00 Changwei Ge <ge.changwei at h3c.com
<mailto:ge.changwei at h3c.com>>:
> 
>     Hi C?dric,
> 
>     These two patches are already picked by Andrew being merged into -mm
tree for now.
>     So you can refer to below links for them:
> 
>    
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ozlabs.org_-7Eakpm_mmots_broken-2Dout_ocfs2-2Dmake-2Dmetadata-2Destimation-2Daccurate-2Dand-2Dclear.patch&d=DwIFAw&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=qhw95Pko-BqAL2AXrJ7mqrE9hNsgJ6TPkRJcYn_28iQ&s=jmUQTkM6tW4X6p1r1wea1mkvvgrZyssoy-HVDaS0tNM&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ozlabs.org_-7Eakpm_mmots_broken-2Dout_ocfs2-2Dmake-2Dmetadata-2Destimation-2Daccurate-2Dand-2Dclear.patch&d=DwIFAw&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=qhw95Pko-BqAL2AXrJ7mqrE9hNsgJ6TPkRJcYn_28iQ&s=jmUQTkM6tW4X6p1r1wea1mkvvgrZyssoy-HVDaS0tNM&e=>
>    
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ozlabs.org_-7Eakpm_mmots_broken-2Dout_ocfs2-2Dtry-2Dto-2Dreuse-2Dextent-2Dblock-2Din-2Ddealloc-2Dwithout-2Dmeta-5Falloc.patch&d=DwIFAw&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=qhw95Pko-BqAL2AXrJ7mqrE9hNsgJ6TPkRJcYn_28iQ&s=rzGu_KehSlpzZUJp2bOKUWzSjUVcgI-UOVMkaePGKSA&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ozlabs.org_-7Eakpm_mmots_broken-2Dout_ocfs2-2Dtry-2Dto-2Dreuse-2Dextent-2Dblock-2Din-2Ddealloc-2Dwithout-2Dmeta-5Falloc.patch&d=DwIFAw&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=qhw95Pko-BqAL2AXrJ7mqrE9hNsgJ6TPkRJcYn_28iQ&s=rzGu_KehSlpzZUJp2bOKUWzSjUVcgI-UOVMkaePGKSA&e=>
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Changwei
> 
>     On 2018/1/10 22:34, BASSAGET C?dric wrote:
>     > Hi Changwei,
>     > Can you give me a ref or a link pointing to your patch ?
>     > Thanks
>     >
>      > 2018-01-10 12:57 GMT+01:00 Changwei Ge <ge.changwei at h3c.com
<mailto:ge.changwei at h3c.com> <mailto:ge.changwei at h3c.com
<mailto:ge.changwei at h3c.com>>>:
>     >
>     >? ? ?Hi BASSAGET,
>     >
>     >? ? ?We ocfs2 developers are solving a DIO crash issue which may
share the same root cause with yours.
>     >
>     >? ? ?You can refer to my patch set of 2 and backport them into your
kernel to see if the issue can be kicked away.
>     >
>     >? ? ? ? ocfs2: make metadata estimation accurate and clear
>     >? ? ? ? ocfs2: try to reuse extent block in dealloc without
meta_alloc
>     >
>     >? ? ?On 2018/1/10 19:48, BASSAGET C?dric wrote:
>     >? ? ?> Hello
>     >? ? ?> Today I reported a bug related to ocfs2 1.8.on proxmox
forum, maybe somebody here will be able to help me...
>      >? ? ? > The bog on proxmox forum :
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.proxmox.com_threads_ocfs2-2Dkernel-2Dbug.39163_&d=DwIFAw&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=qhw95Pko-BqAL2AXrJ7mqrE9hNsgJ6TPkRJcYn_28iQ&s=zBGruJ6Tp1dnASUNNB2UnJ8teV-QBQe6nfDzlpXxZIA&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.proxmox.com_threads_ocfs2-2Dkernel-2Dbug.39163_&d=DwIFAw&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=qhw95Pko-BqAL2AXrJ7mqrE9hNsgJ6TPkRJcYn_28iQ&s=zBGruJ6Tp1dnASUNNB2UnJ8teV-QBQe6nfDzlpXxZIA&e=>
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.proxmox.com_threads_ocfs2-2Dkernel-2Dbug.39163_&d=DwIFAw&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=qhw95Pko-BqAL2AXrJ7mqrE9hNsgJ6TPkRJcYn_28iQ&s=zBGruJ6Tp1dnASUNNB2UnJ8teV-QBQe6nfDzlpXxZIA&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.proxmox.com_threads_ocfs2-2Dkernel-2Dbug.39163_&d=DwIFAw&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=qhw95Pko-BqAL2AXrJ7mqrE9hNsgJ6TPkRJcYn_28iQ&s=zBGruJ6Tp1dnASUNNB2UnJ8teV-QBQe6nfDzlpXxZIA&e=>>
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.proxmox.com_threads_ocfs2-2Dkernel-2Dbug.39163_&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=93_F2INiG6ig-q6s8P3sPY09iW1NMx6_H9zZx13OxhM&s=j8Ae2cUQUVQJOimaDZOI0C-HbAhHPvEV-l6BS23AaSw&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.proxmox.com_threads_ocfs2-2Dkernel-2Dbug.39163_&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=93_F2INiG6ig-q6s8P3sPY09iW1NMx6_H9zZx13OxhM&s=j8Ae2cUQUVQJOimaDZOI0C-HbAhHPvEV-l6BS23AaSw&e=>
>    
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.proxmox.com_threads_ocfs2-2Dkernel-2Dbug.39163_&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=93_F2INiG6ig-q6s8P3sPY09iW1NMx6_H9zZx13OxhM&s=j8Ae2cUQUVQJOimaDZOI0C-HbAhHPvEV-l6BS23AaSw&e=
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.proxmox.com_threads_ocfs2-2Dkernel-2Dbug.39163_&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=93_F2INiG6ig-q6s8P3sPY09iW1NMx6_H9zZx13OxhM&s=j8Ae2cUQUVQJOimaDZOI0C-HbAhHPvEV-l6BS23AaSw&e=>>>
>     >? ? ? >
>     >? ? ? > to resume :?kernel BUG at fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:2017!
>     >? ? ? >
>     >? ? ? > is this related to proxmox kernel or ocfs2 ? or both ?
>      >? ? ? > does it have something to do with
https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2017-January/012701.html
<https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2017-January/012701.html>
<https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2017-January/012701.html
<https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2017-January/012701.html>>
?
>      >? ? ? >
>      >? ? ? > Thanks for your help.
>      >? ? ? > Regards,
>      >? ? ? > C?dric
>      >
>      >
> 
>

Ocfs2 devel - Jan 2018 - kernel bug

[Ocfs2-devel] kernel bug

[Ocfs2-devel] kernel bug