Darrick J. Wong
2016-Dec-09 07:32 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3 0/8] ocfs2: wire up {clone, copy, dedupe}_range
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:54:22PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:> Hi all, > > This is the third submission of a series of patches that wire up the > existing ocfs2 reflinking capabilities to the new(ish) VFS > {copy,clone,dedupe}_range interface. The first few patches clean up > some minor bugs that I found; the last kernel patch contains the new > code. The last patch is a new; it fixes a quota accounting bug. > > A few minor fixes to xfstests are needed to make more of the tests run; > those have been sent separately to the fstests lists. Some of the > xfstests will fail because ocfs2's design does not allow sharing of > blocks between disjoint sets of files with shared blocks. That is to > say, if A shares with B and C shares with D, B and C cannot be made to > share blocks. > > Andrew, could you please queue these up for testing? I'd like to get > them into 4.10 if possible.It's been a week and nobody's written in any objections. Andrew, could this go into linux-next for some soak time? --D> > --D > > [1] https://github.com/djwong/linux/tree/ocfs2-vfs-reflink-4 > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Christoph Hellwig
2016-Dec-09 08:22 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3 0/8] ocfs2: wire up {clone, copy, dedupe}_range
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:32:13PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:> It's been a week and nobody's written in any objections. Andrew, could > this go into linux-next for some soak time?I'm mostly fine with my series, but I would much prefer if this went on top of my patch to implement the copy -> clone fallback in the core to avoid creating annoying merge conflicts.