Am 12.04.2020 um 17:43 schrieb Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw at zxy.spb.ru>:> > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 04:37:06PM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: > >> I have a server I don't have physical access to right now, which has a broken SATA disk that produces mostly errors (but not entirely). >> >> The disk has two partitions that are part of a zpool each. I can't bring the system up with this disk being online, because ZFS is trying its darndest to use it. >> >> I already renamed the GPT partitions in the hope that ZFS would not find them anymore, but it does. >> >> I can't gpart destroy -f ada1 because "device busy". >> >> Is there a way, ideally in the loader, to tell the kernel to ignore ada1 and/or ahcich5? Or can I force ZFS some other way to ignore the disk? I do have a spare disk I can use to replace the failed one, but I can't get the machine into a state where I could even issue the zpool replace command. > > `zpool offline pool device` if you have enoght redundancy?I do, but the command doesn't return. Instead, I'm getting loads of sata error message. -- Stefan Bethke <stb at lassitu.de> Fon +49 151 14070811 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 529 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20200412/96a23ad3/attachment.sig>
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 06:24:09PM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:> Am 12.04.2020 um 17:43 schrieb Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw at zxy.spb.ru>: > > > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 04:37:06PM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: > > > >> I have a server I don't have physical access to right now, which has a broken SATA disk that produces mostly errors (but not entirely). > >> > >> The disk has two partitions that are part of a zpool each. I can't bring the system up with this disk being online, because ZFS is trying its darndest to use it. > >> > >> I already renamed the GPT partitions in the hope that ZFS would not find them anymore, but it does. > >> > >> I can't gpart destroy -f ada1 because "device busy". > >> > >> Is there a way, ideally in the loader, to tell the kernel to ignore ada1 and/or ahcich5? Or can I force ZFS some other way to ignore the disk? I do have a spare disk I can use to replace the failed one, but I can't get the machine into a state where I could even issue the zpool replace command. > > > > `zpool offline pool device` if you have enoght redundancy? > > I do, but the command doesn't return. Instead, I'm getting loads of sata error message.What you zpool configuration?