On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 07:20:06PM +1000, Ian Smith wrote:> On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 23:04:01 +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > The first BETA build of the 10.4-RELEASE release cycle is now available. > > > === Known Issues ==> > > o The 2017Q3 package set used in the 10.4-RELEASE cycle does not include > > KDE4 packages for amd64 and i386. Thus, such packages are not part of > > the amd64 and i386 DVD images either. > > Does this imply that KDE4 pkgs should be included in later BETA|RC DVDs? > > Thanks for all your good work, folks. >They should be, yes. It seems the Solar Eclipse interfered with pkg(8) fetching from the mirrors for BETA1. Glen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20170821/be05ff9c/attachment.sig>
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:18:34 +0000, Glen Barber wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 07:20:06PM +1000, Ian Smith wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 23:04:01 +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > o The 2017Q3 package set used in the 10.4-RELEASE cycle does not include > > > KDE4 packages for amd64 and i386. Thus, such packages are not part of > > > the amd64 and i386 DVD images either. > > > > Does this imply that KDE4 pkgs should be included in later BETA|RC DVDs? > > > > Thanks for all your good work, folks. > > > > They should be, yes. It seems the Solar Eclipse interfered with pkg(8) > fetching from the mirrors for BETA1. Thanks, but is pkg(8) STILL not eclipse-proof? I want my money back! cheers, Ian