Konstantin Belousov
2017-Jul-11 05:48 UTC
[SOLVED] Re: Panic with FreeBSD 11.0-RC2 VM-IMAGE when starting vboxservice
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:00:05PM -0700, Mark Johnston wrote:> I suspect that this is a result of r320763. That change removed a field > from struct vm_map_entry, which is embedded in struct vm_map. Virtualbox > does not reference the fields of struct vm_map directly, but it does > call vm_map_pmap(), which is an inline accessor.Thank you for noting. I do not consider vm_map part of the guaranteed stable KBI, but in this case it is simpler to add padding than to follow principles. Fixed in 320889, will ask re for MFS permissions in a day.
jungle boogie
2017-Jul-13 06:29 UTC
[SOLVED] Re: Panic with FreeBSD 11.0-RC2 VM-IMAGE when starting vboxservice
On 07/10/2017 10:48 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:00:05PM -0700, Mark Johnston wrote: >> I suspect that this is a result of r320763. That change removed a field >> from struct vm_map_entry, which is embedded in struct vm_map. Virtualbox >> does not reference the fields of struct vm_map directly, but it does >> call vm_map_pmap(), which is an inline accessor. > > Thank you for noting. I do not consider vm_map part of the guaranteed > stable KBI, but in this case it is simpler to add padding than to follow > principles. > > Fixed in 320889, will ask re for MFS permissions in a day.I think this is the commit: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/11/sys/vm/vm_map.h?view=log&pathrev=320889 Do you think this will get picked up by/for RC3, which will begin on Friday? https://www.freebsd.org/releases/11.1R/schedule.html Thanks!