Hi, I am sure that some know of this site: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=2bsd-7linux-bench&num=4 I wonder about the results for FreeBSD. As I do not have 11 on my machines, a stupid question. Are there still some debugging aids enabled in 11? I know that some of the results are caused by the use of CLang and some of the results test applications/compilers and not operating systems. Erich
Hi, At the bottom of the article there is link to the source benchmark site.>From a quick glance the benchmarks made not with the same hardware for all.Phoronix is sort of anti-bsd site.. i won't count on the truth of the data they present. Sami ?????? 19 ????? 2016 02:34 AM,? "Erich Dollansky" < erichsfreebsdlist at alogt.com> ???:> Hi, > > I am sure that some know of this site: > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=2bsd-7linux-bench&num=4 > > I wonder about the results for FreeBSD. As I do not have 11 on my > machines, a stupid question. Are there still some debugging aids > enabled in 11? > > I know that some of the results are caused by the use of CLang and some > of the results test applications/compilers and not operating systems. > > Erich > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org" >
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:34:22AM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:> Hi, > > I am sure that some know of this site: > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=2bsd-7linux-bench&num=4 > > I wonder about the results for FreeBSD. As I do not have 11 on my > machines, a stupid question. Are there still some debugging aids > enabled in 11? > > I know that some of the results are caused by the use of CLang and some > of the results test applications/compilers and not operating systems.Most debugging aids off at time of branching stable/11, remain (mostly for non-amd64 architectures switch off too later). Some bench result very stranges
On 19/08/2016 9:34 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote:> Hi, > > I am sure that some know of this site: > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=2bsd-7linux-bench&num=4 > > I wonder about the results for FreeBSD. As I do not have 11 on my > machines, a stupid question. Are there still some debugging aids > enabled in 11?They're off in those versions, but did note compiler (and compiler args) differences between within most tests (See attachments) as you mentioned.> I know that some of the results are caused by the use of CLang and > some of the results test applications/compilers and not operating > systems.gcc/clang tests and defaults in upstream build systems are almost certainly contributors. At a minimum it would be nice to see an attempt to standardise (force) compiler args across all OS runs for the same test, even if this doesn't prove to be perfect. Separating or adding tests for the same tests using non-default compilers (in particular latest GCC versions from ports) so they match across OS's would also be valuable. At a minimum it would be worth Michael highlighting the differences, and ideally removing these variables from the tests, even if they aren't default configurations. Though a test of out of the box configurations is still valuable, it can serve to muddy the underlying differences and make them tougher to isolate.
Unixbench is slower for me since switching to 11-STABLE from 10-STABLE, due to triple drop of 'Pipe Throughput'. Rest looks the same or better. That's all I know. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Benchmarks-results-for-FreeBSD-11-tp6123994p6124304.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.